Start A Petition


US Politics & Gov't  (tags: abuse, corruption, cover-up, crime, democrats, dishonesty, ethics, government, lies, news, obama, usa )

- 1919 days ago -
Could Chuck Hagel, the man President Obama wants to become Secretary of Defense, secretly be a pawn of George Soros? It is a question that liberals would not bear hearing, and one that many conservatives, no doubt, would not bear going unanswered.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Carol D (346)
Monday January 21, 2013, 2:48 pm
Could Chuck Hagel, the man President Obama wants to become Secretary of Defense, secretly be a pawn of George Soros? It is a question that liberals would not bear hearing, and one that many conservatives, no doubt, would not bear going unanswered.

And indeed, evidence has come to light suggesting that the answer to this question may incline toward the positive. Specifically, a recent report by Aaron Klein of KleinOnline suggests the following about the would-be defense secretary:

Former Sen. Chuck Hagel, President Obama’s nominee for defense secretary, serves on the board of a George Soros-funded group that advocates a nuclear-free world.

The Ploughshares Fund has a long history of anti-war advocacy and is a partner of the Marxist-oriented Institute for Policy Studies, which has urged the defunding of the Pentagon and massive decreases in U.S. defense capabilities, including slashing the American nuclear arsenal to 292 deployed weapons.

The Poughshares Fund has also partnered with a who’s who of the radical left, including Code Pink, the pro-Palestinian J Street, United for Peace & Justice, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and the Demos progressive group, where Obama’s former green jobs czar, Van Jones, serves on the board.[...]
A primary Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, a money tunnel in which leftist donors provide funds to finance other radical groups. Tides is itself funded by Soros.[...]

Ploughshares is directed by Joseph Cirincione, who served as an advisor on nuclear issues to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Cirincione also served as director of nuclear policy at the Center for American Progress.

Among the groups Ploughshares donates to the anti-Israel Americans for Peace Now, the Arms Control Association, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Center for Policy Alternatives, the Soros-funded Center for Public Integrity, the radical Citizen Action, Citizens for Environmental Justice, the Coalition for New Priorities and the radical the Institute for Policy Studies.

This is damning stuff, and no doubt many would take evidence of a Soros connection as proof beyond doubt that Hagel is an anti-American radical, or possibly even someone who takes his marching orders from Soros.

But is that proof really so strong? Certainly Hagel’s choice to be on the board of an organization like the Ploughshares Fund, which does list Hagel as a board member on its website, is an argument against his judgment. But how much the organization’s connection to Hagel proves about his involvement with Soros, and how much a simple connection with Soros would prove about Hagel, are wider questions.

Six Degrees of George Soros: Is Hagel Connected?

To begin with, there is the matter of Hagel being on Ploughshares’ board. Certainly, given Ploughshares’ generally extremely anti-war and anti-nuclear stance (as documented in the above article), this is evidence that Hagel holds far more dovish views possibly than even President Obama. In fact, given that far left websites have attacked Soros as a war profiteer in the past, and Soros himself bought 2 million shares of Halliburton in 2007, it may indicate that Hagel holds views to the left of Soros himself.

But does serving on the board of an organization that takes some of its money from Soros prove that Hagel himself is in Soros’ pocket? Probably not. For one thing, given Soros’ aforementioned investment in Halliburton, that would make anyone serving on Halliburton’s board into a potential Soros puppet. It would also open the way to an accusation of Soros-fraternizing against people such as Dick Cheney, which is a difficult accusation to stomach. It is also unclear how much money the Tides Foundation donated to Ploughshares, whether Hagel himself drew a salary from nonprofit work with this group, and how much Hagel was involved in the day-to-day decision making at Ploughshares.

Moreover, if the aforementioned standard that serving on an organization’s board makes you complicit with the people funding it were applied, it would mean that Ploughshares is not Hagel’s only connection to Soros. In fact, given that Hagel is listed as serving on the board of the Chevron Corporation, it would mean that until last year, when Soros sold his shares in Chevron, Hagel was connected to Soros through two separate channels. In fact, given Soros’ prolific charitable giving (not all of which goes to partisan causes), there are probably more connections still to be found in the full list of other organizations whose boards Hagel sits on. That list is as follows:

Bread for the World, Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation, Center for the Study of the Presidency, Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission, George C. Marshall Foundation, Georgetown’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Global Strategy Forum, Global Zero, Hamilton Project, Initiative for Global Development, Lung Cancer Alliance, International Center for the Study Of Radicalization and Political Violence, National Bureau of Asian Research’s Next Generation Leadership Board, Ploughshares Fund, U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, U.S. Institute of Peace Middle East Senior Working Group, U.S. Middle East Project, America Abroad Media, American Security Project, and The Washington Center. He is also co-chairman of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Corporate Council.

Still, say for the sake of argument that Hagel was connected to Soros. Would that mean Hagel was an anti-American or anti-Israeli radical? Maybe, but not necessarily so. Even though Soros himself skews very far left, not everyone with a connection to Soros even qualifies as being a Democrat, let alone being a far left radical, though most of them do qualify as being relatively non-interventionist on foreign policy. For instance, Texas Congressman Ron Paul was accused by Frontpage Magazine of taking advice on foreign policy from Soros-funded scholars during the 2012 election. Paul’s foreign policy views were, obviously, far to the left of the Republican party, and arguably even to the left of the President, but no one would accuse Paul – whose time in Congress included vigorous anti-communist rhetoric prior to the fall of the Soviet Union – of being as far to the Left as the Institute for Policy Studies, which some claim was originally a communist front, though Paul may agree with its scholars on foreign policy.

Finally, retiring Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton may be preparing to assume leadership of one of Soros’ many organizations after leaving her present position. Clinton also spent Election Night 2004 at Soros’ apartment. Clinton’s tenure in office has been criticized for many things, but rarely for insufficient hawkishness. In fact, when she assumed office, Clinton was considered one of the more hawkish members of Obama’s cabinet by some sources.

Granted, from a conservative perspective, Soros’ views on foreign policy are troubling, to say the least. However, those looking for evidence of Hagel’s foreign policy extremism need not go so far as to ascribe sinister motives to his connection to an organization that gets money from another organization that is connected to Soros. The fact that Hagel supported resurrecting a draft, and the mission of the Ploughshares Fund more or less provides that evidence on its own:

Since 1981, Ploughshares Fund has led and supported a community of experts, advocates and analysts to implement smart strategies to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.

As a publicly supported foundation, we have raised over $80 million to fund the smartest people with the best ideas. We’ve leveraged the impact of those funds with our own advocacy, connections, media profile and leadership. Combining high-level advocacy, an enhanced grantmaking capacity and our own expertise, we are enhancing global security.

In short, when a nominee serves on the board of an organization that wants to do away with nuclear weapons altogether, focusing on that organization’s connection to Soros is arguably missing the forest for the trees. The fact that Hagel skews left on foreign policy has become common knowledge by this point, and has not deterred President Obama from nominating him. Skewing far enough left to want to do away with nuclear weapons, on the other hand, may be a tougher sell come Hagel’s confirmation hearings.

Roseann d (178)
Monday January 21, 2013, 3:16 pm
Well, one of Faux's largest investors is a Saudi. Faux has done so much to destroy America so...they do have much in common with Al Qaeda.

Diane O (194)
Monday January 21, 2013, 3:43 pm
Give it up, Roseann. Fox News is one news media.......only one. They aren't powerful enough to destroy America but Obama is!

Roseann d (178)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:23 pm
Diane O. you're clearly delusional as usual. Faux is making a powerplay to buy the LA Times and the Chicago daily paper as well. I know you don't understand the word Monopoly Diane but you should look it up. "The most powerful name is news" That phrase itself is bad for Democracy.

Roseann d (178)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:25 pm
Diane....You look up all of Faux's holdings while you're at it Diane...clearly the FTC should step in and break them up. No "News Corp" should be able to own broadcast and newspapers often in the same region while shutting down smaller legitimate news sources. Do try to educate yourself this year Diane. Make it your New Year's resolution.

Roseann d (178)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:29 pm
Oops FCC not FTC...although now that Faux is buying up foreign markets, maybe that applies as well.

Diane O (194)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:40 pm
Of course, I understand the meaning of the word "monopoly." Fox News isn't there. I'm amazed at how the liberals fret over Fox News. Hey, Obama won! Fox News warned you. Now you are stuck with him.

If, in fact, it is true that Fox News is buying other news outlets they aren't doing anything any different than the biased left wing media conglomerates are doing. So, what's the problem?

Diane O (194)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:41 pm
Don't let Fox News keep you awake at night, Roseann. Remember? All they do is lie.

Roseann d (178)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:44 pm
Faux doesn't keep me awake Diane. But that doesn't stop you from believing them. That's a concern. Especially as we've learned in the past election they tried to back Petraeus as a presidential candidate and exert undue influence. As long as they are around...and growing they are a threat to democracy.

Jae A (316)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:46 pm
Fantastic when the GOP doesn't even support one of their own Republican party members isn't it !

My...Ditto Roseann's comments.

Diane need to worry about destroying the U.S....G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney did that prior to Obama moving into the White House.

Diane O (194)
Monday January 21, 2013, 4:57 pm
Roseann, all I can say is LOL! Patraeus wasn't anywhere near in the running for President. Patraeus has had a stellar career. But, are you referring to his affair? You loved Bill Clinton and he was having oral sex in our Oval Office and then lied about it under oath. Got his bottom IMPEACHED. But, Bill Clinton is a good man, right?
And, to use the liberals vernacular, Fox News tells lies. So, why would that worry you? You've got a vast number of biased left wing news outlets telling the truth, right? Yet, you worry. Why is that?

George W. Bush will look like a saint by the time Obama gets his walking papers in 2016, Jae. History will be very good to George Bush.

Carol D (346)
Monday January 21, 2013, 10:58 pm
They give themselves away Diane when they get all hot and bothered over something they call nothing!! ROTFL It doesn't bother them so much that they consistently complain about it!! Man...if something don't bother me I let it go! As we can see with the liberal lefties though it gets under their skin and that is why they keep coming back for more! LOL

Past Member (0)
Tuesday January 22, 2013, 10:05 am
There is sooo much dirt on the 100s of republican owners, it would be so rewarding to find one god damned thing on Soros, eh? ha ha ha. You haters crack us up.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.