START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

AP Exclusive: IRS Knew Tea Party Targeted in 2011


US Politics & Gov't  (tags: abuse, americans, obamaadministration, corruption, cover-up, crime, democrats, dishonesty, ethics, freedoms, government, Govtfearmongering, lies, news, obama, propaganda, politics, usa )

Carol
- 443 days ago - m.apnews.com
WASHINGTON (AP) - Senior Internal Revenue Service officials knew agents were targeting tea party groups as early as 2011, according to a draft of an inspector general's report obtained by The Associated Press that seemingly contradicts public statements



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Carol Dreeszen (364)
Saturday May 11, 2013, 3:37 pm
WASHINGTON (AP) - Senior Internal Revenue Service officials knew agents were targeting tea party groups as early as 2011, according to a draft of an inspector general's report obtained by The Associated Press that seemingly contradicts public statements by the IRS commissioner.

The IRS apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status. The agency blamed low-level employees, saying no high-level officials were aware.

But on June 29, 2011, Lois G. Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt organizations, learned at a meeting that groups were being targeted, according to the watchdog's report. At the meeting, she was told that groups with "Tea Party," ''Patriot" or "9/12 Project" in their names were being flagged for additional and often burdensome scrutiny, the report says.

The 9-12 Project is a group started by conservative TV personality Glenn Beck.

Lerner instructed agents to change the criteria for flagging groups "immediately," the report says.

The Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration is expected to release the results of a nearly yearlong investigation in the coming week. The AP obtained part of the draft report, which has been shared with congressional aides.

Among the other revelations, on Aug. 4, 2011, staffers in the IRS' Rulings and Agreements office "held a meeting with chief counsel so that everyone would have the latest information on the issue."

On Jan, 25, 2012, the criteria for flagging suspect groups was changed to, "political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform/movement," the report says.

While this was happening, several committees in Congress were writing numerous letters IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman to express concern because tea party groups were complaining of IRS harassment.

In Shulman's responses, he did not acknowledge targeting of tea party groups. At a congressional hearing March 22, 2012, Shulman was adamant in his denials.

"There's absolutely no targeting. This is the kind of back and forth that happens to people" who apply for tax-exempt status, Shulman said at the House Ways and Means subcommittee hearing.

The portion of the draft report reviewed by the AP does not say whether Shulman or anyone else in the Obama administration outside the IRS was informed of the targeting. It is standard procedure for agency heads to consult with staff before responding to congressional inquiries, but it is unclear how much information Shulman sought.

The IRS has not said when Shulman found out that Tea Party groups were targeted.

Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush, a Republican. His 6-year term ended in November. President Barack Obama has yet to nominate a successor. The agency is now run by an acting commissioner, Steven Miller.

The IRS said in a statement Saturday that the agency believes the timeline in the IG's report is correct, and supports what officials said Friday.

"IRS senior leadership was not aware of this level of specific details at the time of the March 2012 hearing," the statement said. "The timeline does not contradict the commissioner's testimony. While exempt organizations officials knew of the situation earlier, the timeline reflects that IRS senior leadership did not have this level of detail."

Lerner's position is three levels below the commissioner.

"The timeline supports what the IRS acknowledged on Friday that mistakes were made," the statement continued. "There were not partisan reasons behind this."

Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee's oversight subcommittee, said the report "raises serious questions as to who at IRS, Treasury and in the administration knew about this, why this practice was allowed to continue for as long as it did, and how widespread it was."

"This timeline reveals at least two extremely unethical actions by the IRS. One, as early as 2010, they targeted groups for political purposes. Two, they willfully and knowingly lied to Congress for years despite being aware that Congress was investigating this practice," Boustany said.

"This is an outrageous abuse of power. Going after organizations for referencing the Bill of Rights or expressing the intent to make this country a better place is repugnant," Boustany added. "There is no excuse for this behavior."

Several congressional committees have promised investigations, including the Ways and Means Committee, which plans to hold a hearing.

On Friday, White House spokesman Jay Carney said the administration expected the inspector general to conduct a thorough investigation, but he brushed aside calls for the White House itself to investigate.

Many conservative groups complained during the 2012 election that they were being harassed by the IRS. They accused the agency of frustrating their attempts to become tax exempt by sending them lengthy, intrusive questionnaires.

The forms, which the groups have made available, sought information about group members' political activities, including details of their postings on social networking websites and about family members.

In some cases, the IRS acknowledged, agents inappropriately asked for lists of donors.

There has been a surge of politically active groups claiming tax-exempt status in recent elections - conservative and liberal. Among the highest profile are Republican Karl Rove's group Crossroads GPS and the liberal Moveon.org.

These groups claim tax-exempt status under section 501 (c) (4) of the federal tax code, which is for social welfare groups. Unlike other charitable groups, these organizations are allowed to participate in political activities, but their primary activity must be social welfare.

That determination is up to the IRS.

The number of groups filing for this tax-exempt status more than doubled from 2010 to 2012, to more than 3,400. To handle the influx, the IRS centralized its review of these applications in an office in Cincinnati.

Lerner said on Friday this was done to develop expertise among staffers and consistency in their reviews. As part of the review, staffers look for signs that groups are participating in political activity. If so, IRS agents take a closer look to make sure that politics isn't the group's primary activity.

As part of this process, agents in Cincinnati came up with a list of things to look for in an application. As part of the list, they included the words "tea party" and "patriot," Lerner said.

"It's the line people that did it without talking to managers," Lerner told the AP on Friday. "They're IRS workers, they're revenue agents."

In all, about 300 groups were singled out for additional review, Lerner said. Of those, about a quarter were singled out because they had "tea party" or "patriot" somewhere in their applications.

Lerner said 150 of the cases have been closed and no group had its tax-exempt status revoked, though some withdrew their applications.
 

Stephen Brian (23)
Saturday May 11, 2013, 9:17 pm
There is a second part to this story, perhaps as large as the story itself: It is getting coverage. Between this and Benghazi, the large media-outlets, which unabashedly sided with Obama during the campaign and in every major conflict during his presidency, appear to be turning against him. If this continues, I call 2014 and 2016 for Republicans. I expect it to continue because I suspect this change in coverage comes from the outlets' concern about their possible new owners as the Koch family intends to purchase the Tribune newspapers and other conservative figures try to expand in U.S. markets.
 

Carol Dreeszen (364)
Sunday May 12, 2013, 2:14 am
That in itself Stephen will be a blessing!! There are in fact more people that supported Obama in 2008 and 2012 that are turning their backs on him because they can see what he is doing is not in the best interest of our country. The one Benghazi witness is a registered Democrat that voted for Obama in both elections and supported Hillary and she was the one who threatened him not to testify! We can't have any better supporters than those who have awaken and seen the fraud and mistrust of those they supported screw them over like Obama and Hillary have!
 

Jason R. (57)
Thursday May 16, 2013, 8:57 am
Would you target a man walking into a bank with a nylon over his head? OMG H8er!!!

The Real IRS Scandal

Yesterday, in response to recent IRS admissions, President Obama called the enhanced investigation of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status "intolerable and inexcusable." And, Attorney General Eric Holder announced a criminal investigation into the allegations against the IRS. But both of them are missing the point.

The scandal here is not that political groups were targeted by the IRS, it's the fact that political groups are being subsidized by John Q. Taxpayer. Groups that are politically motivated, and not really "social welfare" organizations, shouldn't receive preferential tax treatment in the first place - regardless of their political affiliation.

A report by the Inspector General stated that "ineffective management" at the IRS allowed conservative groups to be targeted for over 18 months, and resulted in substantial delays in the processing of their non-profit applications. But, the real "ineffective management" here was Congress's failure to regulate these organizations, and enforce transparency. And, what's truly "intolerable and inexcusable" is the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizen United decision, which opened the campaign-finance floodgates in the first place.

The IRS shouldn't be apologizing for investigating phony "non-profit" organizations, they should be investigating all politically-motivated groups who want to be subsidized by the tax payers. Congress has repeatedly rejected campaign finance reform, and Citizens United moved oversight from the Federal Elections Commission to the IRS. It's impossible to create and enforce reasonable guidelines based on an unreasonable Supreme Court decision.

The only way to really fix this problem is to amend our Constitution to say that money isn't speech, and corporations aren't people. Let's make it happen. Join the fight at MoveToAmend.org.

-Thom
 

Jason R. (57)
Thursday May 16, 2013, 9:45 pm
http://www.care2.com/news/member/410531040/3510890

"The IRS shouldn't be apologizing for investigating phony "non-profit" organizations, they should be investigating all politically-motivated groups who want to be subsidized by the tax payers."

RIGHT! Then why not use search words to find them?

"The one Benghazi witness is a registered Democrat that voted for Obama in both elections and supported Hillary and she was the one who threatened him not to testify!"

All he could testify to is that there weren't boots on the ground when they asked for them. You left that out. The scandal there is the defunding of security by the right, period. Just because fox raises their brows and points at Obama doesn't mean they know anything about it. This is how they have been proven to misinform and dumb down its audience.
 

Carol Dreeszen (364)
Saturday May 18, 2013, 1:01 am
They weren't phony organizations...they were all Conservative organizations!! That is quite different than phony organizations...if they were liberal organizations you would be screaming to high heaven cussing worse than you do now!

Problem is there were no boots on the ground! They asked for boots on the ground and they were denied!
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.