5 Reasons Why The Occupy Wall Street Protests Embody Values Of The Real Boston Tea Party


Written by Lee Fang, a ThinkProgress blogger

In recent years, the Boston Tea Party has been associated with a right-wing movement that supports policies favoring powerful corporations and the wealthy. As ThinkProgress has reported, lobbyists and Republican front groups have driven the current manifestation of the Tea Party to push for giveaways to oil companies and big businesses.

However, the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations picking up momentum across the country better embody the values of the original Boston Tea Party. In the late 18th century, the British government became deeply entwined with the interests of the East India Trading Company, a massive conglomerate that counted British aristocracy as shareholders. Americans, upset with a government that used the colonies to enrich the East India Trading Company, donned Native American costumes and boarded the ships belonging to the company and destroyed the company’s tea. In the last two weeks, as protesters have gathered from New York to Los Angeles to protest corporate domination over American politics, a true Tea Party movement may be brewing:

1.) The Original Boston Tea Party Was A Civil Disobedience Action Against A Private Corporation. In 1773, agitators blocked the importation of tea by East India Trading Company ships across the country. In Boston harbor, a band of protesters led by Samuel Adams boarded the corporation’s ships and dumped the tea into the harbor. No East India Trading Company employees were harmed, but the destruction of the company’s tea is estimated to be worth up to $2 million in today’s money. The Occupy Wall Street protests have targeted big banks like Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, as well as multinational corporations like GE with sit-ins and peaceful rallies.

2.) The Original Boston Tea Party Feared That Corporate Greed Would Destroy America. As Professor Benjamin Carp has argued, colonists perceived the East India Trading Company as a “fearsome monopolistic company that was going to rob them blind and pave the way maybe for their enslavement.” A popular pamphlet called The Alarm agitated for a revolt against the East India Trading Company by warning that the British corporation would devastate America just as it had devastated South Asian colonies: “Their Conduct in Asia, for some Years past, has given simple Proof, how little they regard the Laws of Nations, the Rights, Liberties, or Lives of Men. [...] And these not being sufficient to glut their Avarice, they have, by the most unparalleled Barbarities, Extortions, and Monopolies, stripped the miserable Inhabitants of their Property, and reduced whole Provinces to Indigence and Ruin.”

3.) The Original Boston Tea Party Believed Government Necessary To Protect Against Corporate Excess. Smithsonian historian Barbara Smith has noted that Samuel Adams believed that oppression could occur when governments are too weak. As Adams explained in a Boston newspaper, government should exist “to protect the people and promote their prosperity.” Patriots behind the Tea Party revolt believed “rough economic equality was necessary to maintaining liberty,” says Smith. Occupy Wall Street protesters demand a country that invests in education, infrastructure, and jobs.

4.) The Original Boston Tea Party Was Sparked By A Corporate Tax Cut For A British Corporation. The Tea Act, a law by the British Parliament exempting tea imported by the East India Trading Company from taxes and allowing the corporation to directly ship its tea to the colonies for sale, is credited with setting off the Boston Tea Party. The law was perceived as an effort by the British to bailout the East India Trading Company by shutting off competition from American shippers. George R.T. Hewes, one of the patriots who boarded the East India Trading Company ships and dumped the tea, told a biographer that the East India Trading Company had twisted the laws so “it was no longer the small vessels of private merchants, who went to vend tea for their own account in the ports of the colonies, but, on the contrary, ships of an enormous burthen, that transported immense quantities of this commodity.” Occupy Wall Street demands the end of corporate tax loopholes as well as the enactment of higher taxes on billionaires and millionaires.

5.) The Original Boston Tea Party Wanted A Stronger Democracy. There is a common misconception that the Boston Tea Party was simply a revolt against taxation. The truth is much more nuanced, and there were many factors behind the opposition to the East India Company and the British government. Although the colonists resented taxes levied by a distant British Parliament, in the years preceding the Tea Party, the Massachusetts colony had levied taxes several times to pay for local services. The issue at hand was representation and government accountable to the needs of the American people. Patrick Henry and other patriots organized the revolutionary effort by claiming that legitimate laws and taxes could only be passed by legislatures elected by Americans. According to historian Benjamin Carp, the protesters in Boston perceived that the British government’s actions were set by the East India Trading Company. “As Americans learned more about the provisions of the new East India Company laws, they realized that Parliament would sooner lend a hand to the Company than the colonies,” wrote Carp.

Progressive political movements, from Martin Luther King to Mahatma Gandhi, have drawn on the original American Boston Tea Party for inspiring civil disobedience against oppression. Indeed, the very first Boston Tea Party was truly radical and faced scorn from elites and conservatives of the era.

This post was originally published by ThinkProgress.


Related Stories:

‘Occupy Wall Street’ Issues First Official Declaration

5 Ways To Support the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Movement

Wall Street Protests: Police Brutality Caught On Tape (Video)


Photo from Randy Son of Robert via flickr


William C
William C11 months ago

Thank you.

W. C
W. C11 months ago


Carole H.
Carole H6 years ago

Interesting analogy - thank you.

Anne N.
Anne N.6 years ago

Thank you Donna.

Also, Ira, Obama is so deep in contributions from banks, it is laughable. Absolutely counter to the idea of the movement. Once you realize BOTH republicans & democrats are up to their ears in corruption, it is truly an awakening.

Donna Reid
Donna Reid6 years ago

Ira, I am at this time, a supporter of President Obama. However, a huge reason this movement seems to be so big and important is that it is not politically owned by either party, that it is a free assembly of all sorts of people coming together to fight legalized corruption that our current politicians have silently and vocally supported. Please don't tell people who to vote for, just allow them this opportunity to truly think freely for themselves

Ira L.
Ellie L6 years ago

Limbaugh, Trump, Coulter, and all of Fox who preach from the abortion bible, are in awe of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and can't stop it. We are a force to be dealt with and all the money from the kochroaches, and other greedy (self-serving) millionaires and billionaires, protest as they may, know they are on their way Out! Done! Finished! Americans have awakened to a new generation that has given life to the middle class. Go forward, my sisters and brothers! March and may your message be loud and clear until we rid ourselves of the rampant corruption. Vote Democrat and give President Obama a filibuster-proof majority in the House and Senate and watch him undo the draconian tbagger/republikkklan agenda and move us forward in a progressive way, so he can finish his second term leaving a proud legacy. He stands with the people, and will benefit us like no other. Watch and see!
Don't forget Saturday, Oct. 15, Los Angeles march City Hall to the Financial District. See you there.

Joanna Coombs
Joanna Coombs6 years ago

An interesting article, thank you.

Jonathan Y.
Jonathan Y6 years ago

Looks like some Rs are finally waking up to smell the coffee:


Donna Reid
Donna Reid6 years ago

I absolutely agree with you the other r.. And the Revolution wasn't a war of two political parties on American soil it was war to declare independence from a foreign party continuing to unilaterally tax the colonies. Also interesting is that the greed and globalization that our Representatives have encouraged and have protected has in effect turned the clock back to where we are, once again, in debt to foreign influence and paying for it through the nose!

the Other RobertO
Robert O6 years ago

The original Tea Party was a protest over taxation without representation. That seems fitting for today as well. We are taxed - but our representation is disappearing. Our government has been torn apart by corporate greed, money, and machinations. Corporations are not people. We have few shared objectives.