A Landmark Ruling: India’s Supreme Court Says Trans Rights are Human Rights

In an historic ruling, India’s Supreme Court has for the first time given recognition to India’s “third gender” population. This provides us with a great opportunity to look at why recognizing a third gender is so important.

Estimates suggest that India has around 2 million people who would fall under the bracket of “hijra.” This term can include people who identify as transgender, transexual, gender nonconforming, or those who do not feel it necessary or applicable to identify their gender at all. It should be noted, however, that not all trans people identify as third gender. For those who do not fit the gender binary or society’s expectations of their gender, life in India has until now been very difficult. Often, hijra would be forced into extreme poverty, given little to no government assistance and would frequently have to turn to prostitution in order to make a living. Hijra have in the past also often been denied the right to vote. But not anymore.

India’s Supreme Court ruled this week that gender nonconformity and the right to choosing a gender identity is guaranteed under India’s constitution. In so doing, the court made a number of important declarative statements that, campaigners say, could lead to lasting change in how India’s so-called third gender population is treated.

“Recognition of transgenders as a third gender is not a social or medical issue but a human rights issue,” Justice KS Radhakrishnan, one of the judges who presided in this case, said in the ruling. “Transgenders are also citizens of India,” the court noted, and as such, must be “provided equal opportunity to grow. The spirit of the Constitution is to provide equal opportunity to every citizen to grow and attain their potential, irrespective of caste, religion or gender.”

The ruling further noted, and in a remarkably progressive manner, that third gender people do not identify as either male or female and so forcing them into that bracket is a “denial of their constitutional rights and social justice.” The court also hit out at the “moral failure” that “lies in the society’s unwillingness” to accept an evolving understanding of gender.

As a result, the Court has ordered India’s government to officially recognize India’s trans population as a disfavored class. This in turn will mean the government must now provide official recognition for those who want to identify as third gender, therein allowing identity documents to reflect this fact, while also allowing those who identify as third gender/trans to access government assistance programs that are designed to lift disadvantaged classes from poverty and, for instance, aid them in securing employment and ensuring they receive an education.

This ruling furthers work that has already been started in the country. For instance, the elections commission recently moved to include an “other” or third gender category for the elections that are currently taking place. This meant that, for those who had access to voting stations, many trans people in the country have been able to vote for the first time since being open about their gender identity.

To be sure, this change will not immediately eradicate discrimination against India’s trans community. There still remains a great deal of stigma surrounding being gender nonconforming in many areas of Indian life, but it points a way forward in very clear terms.

This ruling comes after the Supreme Court shocked the gay community and wider human rights groups when it chose to overturn a lower court ruling striking India’s Penal Code provision (377) against homosexuality, essentially making it illegal to be gay in India once more. While at the time leading government voices reacted strongly against the move, they have since gone quiet and, as of this month, it appears the presiding party will not be taking action on this problem. The Supreme Court had been asked to overturn the ruling itself, but it has declined to rehear the case.

There has now been some speculation that with the Court’s ruling on third gender Indians, there is a path forward. The Court has recognized that gender nonconformity does not allow society to strip away rights. As such, LGB people may find that they can make a sex discrimination appeal that will be more palatable to the Court. The logic used about the innateness of gender may also be useful in convincing the court about the immutable quality of sexual orientation and the necessity of striking 377 to allow LGBT people the full plethora of rights they deserve as equal citizens.

It remains to be seen precisely how the court’s decision on third gender rights will translate into government action, but it is undeniable that Tuesday’s ruling could be a massive step forward for India’s trans — and LGB — populations.

Photo credit: Thinkstock.


Janice Thompson
Janice Thompson3 years ago

They say the law changed. Have the people that throw the stones?

Nils Anders Lunde
PlsNoMessage se3 years ago


Charlene Rush
Charlene Rush3 years ago

All we have to do is pay attention, and it becomes easy to see which countries will survive and thrive in the future.

Bonnie Bowen
Bonnie Bowen3 years ago

Thanks India!
Let's hope more countries follow your lead

Clare M.
Clare M3 years ago

India is in a bit of a mess regarding how they treat their citizens. Women are seen as less than a dog by some. Gays are now outcasts again.

This is a step forward but will it make any real change given the above?

Robert Fitzgerald

There are only two genders. But does this mean that they are archetypally expressed as monolithic and isolated from each other? Masculine and feminine as archetypal genders also fit within an archetypal relationship to each other that gives power to the attraction between men and women as well as to interacting gender expression within the psyche of a single person. This means that masculine and feminine often express themselves as what is now being called third gender--both masculine and feminine archetypes combined and expressed within a single individual. This is just the way nature expresses archetypes--but within the connected and interaction of gender archetypes, that expression is enhanced and more often a very natural part of the ideal of gender truth.

Matriarchal religions have also traditionally supported third gender expression as somehow sacred. It has been the masculine patriarchal dogma that outlaws anything outside the two basic gender roles as something necessary for masculine control of society and of women.

Diane K.
Diane K3 years ago

There is much work to be done to get to world where we base a person's value not on their gender, economic status, etc but on the content of their character...someone really smart said that, or something like that (MLK)...

Barbara L.
Past Member 3 years ago

Very good news. A step in a positive direction. Now, India, do something about the rights of girls and women .... The poverty, lack of education, child labor, etc.

David B.
David B3 years ago

so there are only two genders . I'm always amazed that people are willing to make such stupid , assine statements in public and display there ignorance so easily .