Are Google, Amazon and Starbucks Cheating On UK Taxes?

Is Starbucks really not making profits in Britain?

That’s what the company claimed on Monday, when angry UK lawmakers charged that Starbucks, Google and Amazon are paying little or no tax on their earnings in Britain, even while they have racked up billions of dollars in sales.

Hard to believe when there are over 200 Starbucks coffee shops within a 12-mile radius of Trafalgar Square, in the center of London.

A Reuters report last month showed that Starbucks had paid no corporation, or income, tax in Britain in the past three years and had paid only 8.6 million pounds since 1998.

Yet over this period, it sold 3.1 billion pounds worth of coffee.

Google, Amazon and Starbucks faced aggressive questioning by British Members of Parliament last week over their decision to base their European businesses outside the UK to avoid paying full UK tax. The companies were questioned as to why they have offices registered in Ireland and Luxembourg, which incur lower tax rates, and also how they charge their own subsidiary companies for services, a practice known as transfer pricing.

Britain’s Public Accounts Committee invited the three big companies to give evidence amid mounting public and political concern that big international companies are avoiding taxes.

Not surprisingly, legislators said they could not accept that Starbucks had reported losses for all but one of the 15 years it has operated in the UK.

According to The Guardian, Member of Parliament Charlie Elphicke told the House of Commons on November 5 that Amazon had paid an effective UK tax rate of 2.5% on 2011 earnings of 309bn. Google paid 0.4% on 2.5bn. Starbucks paid nothing, though its UK earnings were 365m.

From NBC News:

“You have run the business for 15 years and are losing money and you are carrying on investing here. It just doesn’t ring true,” said Margaret Hodge, head of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee.

Troy Alstead, Starbucks global chief financial officer, acknowledged to the panel that its taxable profits in the U.K. are calculated after royalties paid to its European headquarters in the Netherlands have been deducted. Alstead acknowledged that it has a special tax arrangement with the Dutch government covering its headquarters.

Companies operating in Europe can base themselves in any of the 27 EU nations, allowing them to take advantage of a particular country’s low tax rates.

Amazon is under scrutiny because of its registered base in Luxembourg, which allowed it to generate 3.3bn of sales in the UK last year yet pay no corporation tax. It has also been able to pay 3% VAT on UK book sales, rather than the 20% UK rate.

Amazon’s main UK unit paid less than 1 million pounds in income tax last year

Matt Brittin, Google Vice President for Sales and Operations, Northern and Central Europe, acknowledged the company did cut its tax bill by channeling profits from European sales through Bermuda but said this was perfectly legal.

Google’s filings show it had $4 billion of sales in the UK last year, but despite having a group-wide profit margin of 33 percent, its main UK unit reported a loss in 2011 and 2010. It had a tax charge of just 3.4 million pounds in 2011. The search engine provider books European sales via an Irish unit, an arrangement that allowed it to pay taxes at a rate of 3.2 percent on non-U.S. profits last year.

There’s something fishy going on here. Let’s hope that UK legislators can do something about it.

Related Care2 Coverage

Amazon Founder Gives $2.5 Million To Gay Marriage Effort

Starbucks And The War Over The Paper Cup

Following Iran’s Lead, China Blocks Google

Photo Credit: Ivana DiCarlo


Neil Bradley
Neil B5 years ago

Good article. I think it's disgusting that they can earn so much money but pay so little in tax due to loopholes. The amount of tax they should be paying would help Britain's economy very well.

Sue H.
Sue H5 years ago

No More Laws with Loopholes!! Exporting corruption is simply evil.

Berny p.
berny p5 years ago

They can do this legally, taking advantage of 'tax loopholes'. It's what they pay their accountants for.

Morally, of course, it's indefensible!

Keri Ferguson
Keri Ferguson5 years ago

I'm self employed and pay my taxes. It disgusts me that these companies are getting away with this loop hole in the system. If I didn't pay my taxes, I'd be thrown in jail!

Graham Cheaney
Graham Cheaney5 years ago

They most certainly should and I hope the government will be successful in getting a fair tax level from them


Carol D.
Past Member 5 years ago

Yes if Uk companies and ordinary citizens have to pay tax then certainly every company trading in UK should pay Close the loopholes

Mark Tarrant
Past Member 5 years ago

If ordinary Joe Bloggs has to legally pay taxes so should rich companies.

Jonathan Harper
Jonathan H5 years ago


Sian R.
Sian R5 years ago

They can do this legally, taking advantage of 'tax loopholes'. It's what they pay their accountants for. Morally, of course, it's indefensible and I try not to shop at such places.
I seem to recall our big nationwide pharmacist, Boots, is also taking advantage of these loopholes; which is why I don't shop there any more.

Silvia Paulina Gomez Chav
Lucia Fox5 years ago