AT&T, T-Mobile Withdraw FCC Application: How OWS Played a Part

AT&T and T-Mobile announced Thursday that they have withdrawn their application for FCC approval of their $39 billion deal, which has been challenged by the US Justice Department. AT&T will take a one-time pre-tax $4 billion accounting charge to “reflect the potential break up fees due Deutsche Telekom in the event the transaction does not receive regulatory approval.” Deutsche Telekom AG owns T-Mobile; in a statement, the companies said that they had taken action after FCC chair Julius Genachowski indicated on Tuesday that he intends to put AT&T and T-Mobile through a “long and excruciatingly expensive administrative hearingafter the similarly “long and excruciatingly expensive court case the Justice Department has already lined up.”

The $4 billion represents the $3 billion cash and $1 billion book value of spectrum that AT&T had pledged in break-up fees to Deutsche Telekom, should the transaction not win regulatory approval. If AT&T and T-Mobile had chosen to face the FCC, it would have been at least a year before the deal could have been approved.

FCC staff said that, contrary to AT&T’s and T-Mobile’s claims, the merger would not produce benefits for consumers in the form of creating jobs — AT&T claimed 96,000 would arise from the deal — and expansion of wireless broadband, and that the proposed merger would further winnow down competition in the wireless market.

Public interest advocates called on AT&T to simply withdraw the deal. By withdrawing the application, the FCC is now unable to publicize its information showing that the deal is not in the interest of consumers:

“Withdrawal of the FCC applications should be seen for what it is: a concession that the deal would create a duopoly in the national wireless market that will result in higher prices and reduced choice in handsets,” said Andrew Jay Schwartzman, of the Media Access Project, in a statement. “AT&T was unable to show that it actually needs T-Mobile’s assets to build out high-speed broadband.”

AT&T announced the deal in March and has since been engaged in an intensive campaign to promote it to the public, state and federal regulators, unions and Congress. Back in March, the climate for the merger had seemed more favorable: The White House was stressing the need for “near-ubiquitous mobile broadband, which AT&T promised the acquisition would help accomplish.” Also, just a few months earlier, the government had approved a major telecom merger, between Comcast and NBC Universal; with the economy lagging, the government seemed in the mood to have a “friendly dialogue with corporate America.”

But then came Occupy Wall Street and the spread of anti-corporate America sentiment.

“Occupy protesters everywhere should take heart that one of the most politically well-connected corporations does not always get whatever it wants from the U.S. government,” said Cathy Sloan, vice president of the Computer and Communications Industry Association. “This is one company that is not going to get a pass.”

Despite AT&T’s carefully orchestrated lobbying campaign, which won over many state attorneys general and members of Congress, the public hostility toward corporate interests has been growing. That was evident in the consumer backlash against Bank of America’s proposed debit card fees and word that consumers were withdrawing savings from big banks and turning to smaller credit unions.

In their statement, AT&T and T-Mobile said that they would refile with the FCC “as soon as practical.”

Related Care2 Coverage

FCC Decries Lack of Media Diversity, Stymies Low Power TV

Sprint Ad Opposing T-Mobile Takeover Pulled After Trans Community Complains

What Does Proposed AT&T and T-Mobile Merger Mean?





Photo by Roger Schultz


William C
William C10 months ago

Thank you.

W. C
W. C10 months ago


Jeanne Rogers
Jeanne Rogersabout a year ago

Thank you for sharing.

Jeanne Rogers
Jeanne Rogersabout a year ago

Thank you for sharing.

Duane B.
.5 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Holly Lawrence
Holly Lawrence6 years ago

I was an AT&T customer forboth a cellphone and landline - i changed lboth ast year and have mever been happier..Yime for Ma Bell to move over .. and don't know OWS part in this .. doubt that ..

Martha Eberle
Martha Eberle6 years ago

Glad to see this go down, and Hooray for Occupy Wall Street IN ALL CITIES!

K s Goh
KS Goh6 years ago

Thanks for the article.

Lynda Duke
Lynda Duke6 years ago

I read where AT&T is going to buy up the German Tmobile and get in the back door - but not if I have anything to say. If AT&T buys up Tmobile, I'll find another server.

Christopher C.
Chris C6 years ago

As a T-Mobile customer I had a moment of elation, but then as Deutsche Telekom has stated, even though they are doing well in Europe, they still have plans to unload the US branch of their company. So who knows what the future is for T-Mobile?

I was going to sign up for 2 more years so I'd be locked into a good rate. After that, I would not stay with AT&T...they are the most expensive of all the cell companies here in the US for smart phones.

I came over from years with Verizon and have had great coverage with T-Mobile along with affordable rates and great customer service. Been with T-Mobile for almost 5-years. But again, who knows what the future will bring?!?