Because Burning’s Too Good For ‘Em: The Latest in Book Bannings

I love my Harry Potters.  Please don’t take my Huck Finn away.  I’ve seen them come for the Farenheit 451 without a hint of irony, and watched them fume over To Kill a Mockingbird.

They are the book banners.  They have a usual list.  They are on a crusade to protect their children from the possibilities of offensive words, explicit sexual situations, or worldviews that might make them second guess their familial beliefs.

The are the very definition of rigid thinkers.  And bizarrely enough, they want to ban the very definitions themselves.

That’s right.  They came for the dictionary.

A Menifee, California, school district has banned the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Because the book contains the words “oral sex.” The school district is now “forming a committee to review whether dictionaries containing the definitions for sexual terms should be permanently banned.” Of course they are.

Obviously, the answer is to create an abridged version of the dictionary that only contains non-sexual words.  There’s no need for those other, vulgar words, after all.  Besides, once they finally get all of those books that might mention sex off the shelves and out of schools, there will be no reason for their children to come across those words anyway.

To get them one step closer, one school district is resuing to teach that pile of filth and dirty sexual themes known as “The Diary of Anne Frank.” 

“The Diary of a Young Girl: the Definitive Edition,” which was published on the 50th anniversary of Frank’s death in a concentration camp, will not be used in the future, said James Allen, director of instruction for the 7,600-student system. The school system did not follow its own policy for handling complaints about instructional materials, Allen said.

The diary documents the daily life of a Jewish girl in Amsterdam during World War II. Frank started writing on her 13th birthday, shortly before her family went into hiding in an annex of an office building. The version of the diary in question includes passages previously excluded from the widely read original edition, first published in Dutch in 1947. That book was arranged by her father, the only survivor in her immediate family. Some of the extra passages detail her emerging sexual desires; others include unflattering descriptions of her mother and other people living together.

See, the students need to use the more sanitized version, not the one that talks about a young girl going through the changes of adolescence, including hormonal issues.

Frankly, it’s probably just as well.  If they got caught looking up any of the dirty words they might get the dictionary banned.


William C
William C2 months ago

Thank you for the information.

W. C
W. C2 months ago

Thanks for caring.

Jo Recovering
Jo S2 years ago

Thank you Robin.

john pierce
John Pierce3 years ago

Book banning should be banned.

pam w.
pam w3 years ago

Oh, good grief! If they're old enough to read and use a dictionary, they're old enough to know a definition!

Would the person who voted "yes" in the poll be willing to tell us why? Or are you too embarrassed to admit it?

Gregory K.
Gregory K.3 years ago

Banning a Dictionary? Really? Wow.

Nimue Pendragon

Books should never be banned or burned. Makes me cringe seeing that picture.

Dave C.
David C4 years ago

both seem these are the same people who think we should be reading The Bible in school....that has more sex in it than anything I think....

ERIKA SOMLAI4 years ago

thank you for sharing

Jeanne M.
Jeanne M6 years ago

They can protect themselves and their children fom whatever they want.
But hands off my reading lists. And keep your prying little fingers out of public libraries, because my taxes help to pay for those.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to read some lust and murder and adultery and betrayal - 'The Six Wives of Henry VIII'.