Combating the Military Sexual Assault Crisis Should Come Before Equality Under the Draft

Written by Juliette Faraone 

On June 14, the Senate voted 85 to 13 to pass a defense authorization bill which would require women to register for Selective Service. But in a military landscape rife with sexual violence, this step toward women’s full equality under the law seems short-sighted and even irresponsible.

via Wikimedia and licensed through Creative Commons 3.0

Photo Credit: Wikimedia

2016 marked the first year the U.S. military allowed women in combat roles. Back in February, we reported the introduction of a bill by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.) which sought women’s inclusion in the draft. The Senate has reviewed the bill, and seems to be of the opinion that if women are fit to fill combat positions, there’s no real reason to exclude them from Selective Service registration.

The two Republican representatives have stated they oppose the inclusion of women to combat roles, but feel it’s only fair that our country consider the impact of this change, saying at the time of the House bill introduction, “If this administration wants to send 18-20 year old women into combat, to serve and fight on the front lines, then the American people deserve to have this discussion through their elected representatives.”

The legislation, which approved government defense spending, must still go through an extensive review process before coming law: The House reviewed its own version of the bill earlier this year and after some deliberation passed an authorization which omitted it. The House and Senate must now attempt to reconcile the differences between the two versions. At that point, the agreed bill would then face the possibility of a presidential veto.

It’s encouraging to read that Congress is focused on attaining women’s equality. (As eagerly as they acted to rectify the inequality of the Selective Service Act, one would think it’d be simple enough to enforce already-existent bills which prohibit sex-based wage discrimination and champion equal rights for women, right?) But in some ways, this legislation effectively erases that women in the military are working in the midst of a rape culture crisis—and thusly would put more women at risk.

Over 20% of active-duty female soldiers are sexually assaulted while serving, making these women more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than shot by enemy fire. (The 20% statistic reflects cases which were reported, leaving the number of unreported occurrences to be anyone’s guess.) Though the dangers facing women in the military are clearly known, they have continued to take a backseat to issues deemed more pressing—including defense spending. A 2015 U.N. Council urged the U.S. military to work to “prevent sexual violence in the military and ensure effective prosecution of offenders and redress for victims.” Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York has tried for three years to get an amendment passed which would change the way military sexual assault cases are handled. Yet little has actually been done by Congress to address these ongoing issues.

Until action is taken to keep the women serving in our nation’s military free from sexual assault and rape, they will never be equal members of the armed forces. And although the draft’s inclusion of women appears to signal a changing attitude toward gender norms in the military, this legislation isn’t the most important step toward full-scale gender equality for women within it. The military sexual assault epidemic makes it evident that women are not treated the same as men even as they serve our country, and that epidemic makes Mandatory Selective Service registration for women patently reckless.

This post originally appeared on Ms. Magazine.

Photo Credit: California National Guard/Flickr

98 comments

Jim Ven
Jim Ven2 years ago

thanks for sharing.

SEND
Sarah Hill
Sarah Hill2 years ago

I don't like the idea of drafting women, but I agree this issue has to come first.

SEND
Siyus Copetallus
Siyus C2 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

SEND
Ora S.
Past Member 2 years ago

Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ http://www.postjob10.com

SEND
ron D.
ron D2 years ago

Both addressing sexual assaults in the military ( and civilian society) and requiring women to register for the draft should happen. There is no chicken or the egg decision to be made. Btw- registering for the draft does not equal being drafted. With equal rights come equal responsibility under the law....you cannot and should not be able to pick and choose. Sexual and other assault is not a matter of law but is a problem of people who violate the law and how the laws are enforced.

SEND
Danuta Watola
Danuta W2 years ago

Thank you for the information.

SEND
Margaret Goodman
Margaret Goodman2 years ago

Fiona Ogilvie wrote seemingly of feminists, " ... you want to hide out in your paranoid fantasies of a rape culture ... " For sure I'll never understand men, but it seems to me that a great deal of male human culture consists of thinking of women as sex objects and that the manly men take, by force and/or deception if necessary, what they want..


SEND
Joseph Belisle
Joseph Belisle2 years ago

At first I objected to the title, as I think we could be so progressive as to do both but the author makes her point very well. Yes, we need to make the military address this horrific problem before adding women to the draft. There is no excuse for allowing any rapist to go unpunished.

SEND
Danuta Watola
Danuta W2 years ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
Quanta Kiran
Quanta Kiran2 years ago

noted

SEND