England Bans Cruel Shock Collars

When you’re training your pet, most experts agree it’s most effective to reward good behavior rather than punish unwanted behavior. And anyone who cares about the welfare of animals knows that punishment by abuse is a definite no-no.

One form of abusive punishment is the shock collar or e-collar, which can zap a pet with up to 6,000 volts of electricity for as long as 11 painful seconds. Some collars spray noxious chemicals.

In the UK, Scotland and Wales have already banned these cruel devices. The government of England announced in August that it, too, will prohibit the use of collars that cause pets what Environment Secretary Michael Gove referred to in a press release as “harm and suffering.”

As the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) pointed out in the press release, in addition to hurting pets, there is evidence these collars can re-direct aggression or generate anxiety-based behavior in pets, thus making behavioral and health problems even worse.

Gove, naturally, is catching flak from shock collar manufacturers, who are complaining that he opposed a ban just six months ago. In a letter to the Royal Veterinary College, he suggested there was insufficient evidence to support outlawing the collars.

What changed his mind?

He hasn’t revealed the reason, but maybe popular opinion swayed him. In a 2014 survey by the Kennel Club, the vast majority of participants – 74 percent of them – supported a shock collar ban.

While England’s new shock collar ban is good news, it does not, unfortunately, prohibit the sale of these devices. And unlike in Scotland and Wales, the ban does not include electronic containment fences, aka invisible fences.

These “fences” are actually buried electrical wires that shock animals when they walk over them. Although the fences aren’t being banned, at least the statutory codes of practice in the Animal Welfare Act are being amended to ensure these fences are only used as a last resort and installed by professionals. Ian Gregory, a lobbyist for shock collar manufacturers as well as the—e-cigarette and fracking industries—opposed the  invisible fence ban.

Gregory, who according to BBC News believes the accounts of the pain inflicted by shock collars on pets is “exaggerated” by animal charities, was successful in convincing government officials that invisible fences have helped prevent cats from being struck and killed by cars.

Here in the United States, there are no federal laws banning shock collars or invisible fences. Animal welfare organizations, like the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), would like the U.S. to follow England’s lead in prohibiting these devices.

“At best, they are unpleasant for your dog, and at worst, they may cause your dog to act aggressively and even bite you,” the HSUS says on its website

Take Action

More than 173,000 people signed a Care2 petition urging the UK to ban shock collars. These cruel devices should be banned in the United States as well. Please sign and share this petition urging Congress members to prohibit the sale and use of these cruel devices.

Want to make a difference on an issue you find deeply troubling? You, too, can create a Care2 petition, and use this handy guide to get started. You’ll find Care2’s vibrant community of activists ready to step up and help you.

 

Photo credit: Tony Alter/Flickr

111 comments

Georgina Elizab M

petition signed in March. Good for U.K

SEND
Veronica D
Veronica Danie9 days ago

Thank you so very much.

SEND
Veronica D
Veronica Danie9 days ago

Thank you so very much.

SEND
Veronica D
Veronica Danie9 days ago

Thank you so very much.

SEND
Nicole Heindryckx

@ Conor D : First of all, I would recommend you to google. There is a lot of info based on real facts and examinations by various organizations who are involved with dogs' behavior, results of many investigations, etc.. I have read quite about 8/10 of them, and I have NOT found ONE who was in favor of keeping the E-collar to train / educate or re-educate your pet.
I do not know whether it is effectively used for training of "working dogs" or "hunting" dogs, but a majority 73 % of the dog owners also were AGAINST the use of these collars. And they can effectively cause burn injuries, all depending on the Voltage used and the number of times you use it frequently each day. If I am not sure about something, I don't write comments before having informed myself via various sources.

SEND
Nicole Heindryckx

@ Massimiliano Ricardo : Sad you are recently ONLY writing in Italian. Afraid of getting some comments on what your write. This is an INTERNATIONAL website. Have you any idea how many members speak / write / understand Italian. And you know English very well, because you used to write it before !!!

SEND
Carol J
Carol Johnson10 days ago

Signed thanks for sharing

SEND
rita uljee
rita uljee11 days ago

so very good ro know this is in the passed! thanks U.K.

SEND
Filomena C
Filomena C11 days ago

Thanks!

SEND
Filomena C
Filomena C11 days ago

Good news!

SEND