For Less Weiner, Elect More Women

OK, so I fell for Anthony Weiner’s lies about the whole “woe is me, my Twitter account was hacked” thing. But, honestly, were there many of us who thought that in this day and age of political sex scandals — or scandals involving semi-nude self-portraits — that any elected official would be stupid enough to Tweet images of himself to women he’d never even met and think he wouldn’t get caught? If the first rule of the internet is that E-mail is forever, it’s not a leap to realize that all social media is forever, as well. Delete things as much as you want, the fingerprints will always be there.

The level of dumb-assness (yes, that’s a very journalistic word!) in the whole Weiner story is amazing to me. In the immortal words of George W. Bush — fool me once, um, wait, uh, won’t get fooled again.

While the few rules I offered Congressman Weiner about how to deal with the media when they think they’ve got the goods on you aren’t quite relevant anymore, I’ve got one more for him and all the other powerful men out there:  

Dudes, keep your body parts and delusions of grandeur to yourselves!

No matter how much a woman says she wants you to DM her a photo of your pecs or your penis, she doesn’t really want to see it. She just wants to see if you’ll actually send it. And if you’re not savvy enough to know in this social media era that you can’t take ANYTHING back that you put out there into cyberspace, well, then, you really aren’t smart enough to be running this country.

As for those on the political right who think this is a major “gotcha” moment for the Democrats that will bring down a possible future mayor of New York City, let me just say two words –David. Vitter. You’ve still got him, you even re-elected him, and you apparently think it’s perfectly fine for a man who cheats on his wife with a prostitute to be one of 100 U.S. Senators. I’m not making any excuses for the congressman from New York, I’d just ask Republicans to remember the many occasions when the scandal shoe has been on the GOP foot.

Of course, there’s an easy way to just avoid all this in the future — elect more women!

Whenever a new sex scandal makes breaking news, it’s almost never a woman. Now, maybe that’s just because there are fewer women in elective office so there are fewer chances that a woman in power will get outed for any online dalliances. What I think is more likely, though, is that women are just smarter and, frankly, too damn busy for this sort of nonsense. For most political women, it was hard enough to get elected in the first place; they’re not going to jeopardize what they worked so hard for by flashing the internets with some bikini shots. And many of those political women are moms who know better than to embarrass their kids with having to see their mother stand up at some news conference podium to admit that when she was supposed to be in the well of the House of Representatives she was actually in the cloakroom trying to get a WiFi signal to dash off a quick Tweet to some college dude across the country.

As Dee Dee Myers said in her book Why Women Should Rule the World, “I’m confident predicting there would be fewer sex scandals if women were in power … I don’t think Hillary Clinton is going to be hitting on the intern.” Electing more women to avoid this sort of semi-sex scandal isn’t a question of moral superiority, it’s just common sense. I realize that by making this argument, there will be those who say I’m being sexist by contending that women would never fall the way so many political men have in recent years. Maybe it is.

But the truth of the matter is that for the vast majority of women, if we’ve got any spare time and we decide to spend it in the world of social media, we’re more about building something positive for our communities. We’re less concerned about pumping up our egos by pretending that some hot guy in his 20s is still interested in us Boomer and Gen X ladies. We know better and we just don’t have time for that craziness.

As for Anthony’s punishment, my friend from the other side of the political aisle E.M. Zanotti suggested that there’s no need for the Congressman to resign — he’s a guy named Weiner who’s been busted in a scandal involving TwtiPics of his privates. Isn’t that political punishment enough?

This post was originally published by MOMcrats. Read more by the author by checking out her new book, PunditMom’s Mothers of Intention: How Women & Social Media Are Revolutionizing Politics in America.

Related Stories:

Weiner: This Was a Personal Failing: Updated

Someone Tell The Times That Women Like Politics Too

Women: The Key To The Future of Progressive Politics


Photo from azipaybarah via flickr
Written by Joanne Bamberger, a blogger for MOMcrats and PunditMom.


Fred Hoekstra
Fred H5 years ago

Thank you Lindsay, for Sharing this!

Maureen North
Maureen North6 years ago

I agree. There are too many dicks in politics. Ha ha no. I think only women and men with integrity should hold political office.

kenneth m.
kenneth m6 years ago

Sarah palin. Is a woman

Norma V.
Norma Villarreal6 years ago

How about men and women with integrity and brains as leaders? Stop leading with the sexual organs!

Diana S.
Diana P6 years ago

I vote for those I feel are best qualified and will do a good job. I'm not going to base my vote on someone's gender. Get real!

Seneca O.
Seneca O6 years ago

I LOVE the title of this article! Regarding whether or not the idea is sexist: I don't think it's sexist to admit that men and women have different strengths and weaknesses, in fact I think we would be remiss not to. We just don't have enough women in office for a long enough time to see what sort of administrative weaknesses women have, and I think that's a damn shame. I think it would be sexist to say that women are the superheroes who would come in and fix every world problem and maintain moral superiority etc, -- women find ways to destroy themselves just as well as men. But to refuse women the chance at administrative positions they deserve is decidedly sexist.

John Doucette
John Doucette6 years ago

Whether or not Rep. Weiner goes is up to the House ethics committee and/or the voters in his district. As it is, one would think that as computer literate as Weiner has appeared to be, he would have known better. Unless he has done something unethical according to House rules, I would think the embarrassment is plenty of punishment. It will dog him for years. Some of his critics have called this lapse in judgement to be potentially lapses of judgement in official matters. That criticism could apply to just about all politicians. Polls in his district don't seem to share that criticism.

Gina P.
Regina P6 years ago

Proof that some elected officials ARE that stupid! And Weiner is too stupid to be in office.

Dianna M.
Dianna M6 years ago

As a woman, I have to say that the theory that if more women were in charge things will be better--is a load of crap. I work with women, and I can't even count how many knives were stuck in my back, over nothing. And Mit W.'s point about female teachers having 'inappropriate relations' with their students was dead-on.

As for my female coworkers, one of the women who was particularly apt at kissing up to the boss and stabbing me in the back is now divorced--turns out that last child wasn't her husband's.

As for Sarah Palin, every time she opens her mouth, the enamel on my teeth gets a little thinner.

Mit W.
Mit Wes6 years ago

While i was driving home from work, listening to the news about yet another teacher being suspended for having an inappropiate relationship with one of HER female students, i couldn't help think that you, Lindsay, are, journalistically speaking, an idiot.

This was a character failing of a particular individual who happens to be male. If you have a son, what kind of message do you think your article will give him ?