Guess Which Side the DOJ Is Taking in the Cake Baker vs. Gay Couple Case?

It’s been years – five, to be precise – since America first learned of that baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a homosexual couple on the grounds that it went against his religious beliefs. Now, the baker, who is appealing his case to the U.S. Supreme Court, has an unexpected ally – the U.S. Department of Justice.

The Colorado Supreme Court has already ruled that Jack Phillips, the baker, did not have the right to turn down business to Charlie Craig and David Mullins. As a business owner who serves the public, Phillips is obligated to follow anti-discrimination laws and provide a wedding cake just as he would for an opposite-sex couple.

According to the brief the DOJ filed, this case comes down to a matter of artistic and religious expression. “A custom wedding can be sufficiently artistic to qualify as pure speech, akin to sculptural centerpiece. In short, a custom wedding cake is not an ordinary baked good; its function is more communicative and artistic than utilitarian.”

Nothing shows commitment to the LGBTQ community quite like inventing loopholes to permit people to legally discriminate! Thanks for sticking your noses into this one, Jeff Sessions and company.

Previously, the Colorado court decided that baking a cake does not convey an endorsement of same-sex marriage, so it does not deprive Phillips of his First Amendment rights.

Louise Melling, a lawyer with the ACLU representing the same-sex couple, was astonished that the federal government decided to stake a claim in this fight. “Even in an administration that has already made its hostility [toward gay people apparent]… I find this nothing short of shocking,” she said. “What the Trump administration is advocating for is nothing short of a constitutional right to discriminate.”

During his campaign, President Donald Trump made lofty claims that he would be a champion of LGBTQ causes, only to fail to deliver on that pledge at nearly every turn. Trump chose a homophobic man (Mike Pence) to be his running mate, vowed to ban transgender people from the military, and declared that federal law doesn’t prevent discrimination against gay people.

Given that the “wedding cakes have artistic merits” argument has already been unsuccessful with the lower courts, for Trump’s DOJ to latch on to that argument now seems to be a largely symbolic way of pleasing the conservative base that still opposes same-sex marriage.

If conservatives can’t get rid of gay marriage altogether, they’ll settle for just attempting to ruin their wedding ceremonies. Pettiness abides in the Trump White House.

Photo credit: Thinkstock

76 comments

Marie W
Marie W9 months ago

Thanks for sharing.

SEND
Jerome S
Jerome S10 months ago

thanks

SEND
Jerome S
Jerome S10 months ago

thanks

SEND
Jim V
Jim Ven10 months ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
Jim V
Jim Ven10 months ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
Paulo R
Paulo Reeson10 months ago

ty

SEND
Paulo R
Paulo Reeson10 months ago

ty

SEND
Michelle Spradley
Michelle Spradleyabout a year ago

The baker has as much right to refuse to accept business as the consumer has to refuse to patronize the business. This is as far as any of these cases should ever go. Courts should start fining people for wasting their time with matters of choice. I would bet that everyone that supports taking away the freedom of choice from this bakery owner also support the right of women to kill the unborn life they find growing inside them because they decide having a baby would be too much of an inconvenience.

SEND
Sarah Hill
Sarah Hillabout a year ago

This case should be thrown out. There were plenty of other bakeries they could have gone to instead of trying to force someone to violate their religious beliefs!

SEND
Stephanie s
Stephanie Yabout a year ago

Thank you

SEND