How Deadly Charcoal is Bought and Sold in an African Market


Written by Brian Merchant

Xipamanine is a sprawling, labyrinthine marketplace in the heart of Maputo, Mozambique’s capital. On the street outside, tinny music blares and a bustling throng mills around. Inside, a series of winding corridors leads you through a maze of colorful booths that boast a wide variety of wares: shoes, stereo equipment, coconuts, toys, tomatoes, rugs, seeds, nuts, goats, and charcoal. Lots of charcoal.

You can buy it wholesale, in a gigantic sack with a month’s worth of cooking fuel, for about $20. An entire open air section of the market is dedicated to storing these bags; they’re stacked in imposing dust-covered piles. Or, you can buy smaller portions from vendors who buy the big loads, in tins as cheap as $0.45. The catch is, you’ll need about three of those tins to cook meals for a a single day. Most Mozambicans opt for the latter, since they typically make between $100-200 a month.

We were first led to Xipamanine by representatives from CleanStar Mozambique, a company that’s hoping to eventually make much of the market for charcoal obsolete. After all, the stuff is a leading cause of death from respiratory illness and a top driver of deforestation in the region.

But it’s also what families have been using to cook for as long as anyone can remember. I returned to the market a day later, along with Triple Pundit’s Jennifer Boynton and a translator, and here’s what we found: Ask any given person in the market, and they’ll tell you, yes, they cook with charcoal, and that it’s safe to do so. We spoke to perhaps a dozen different people in the market, and each offered a variant of the same blunt response.

Virginia, a mother of three who sells a variety of nuts, vegetables and seeds at the market, says she always uses charcoal to cook. Robert, a young man who rounds up discarded cardboard boxes for recycling, says that coal is the “most secure” and safest way to cook, when compared to wood and gas. Amelia, who actually sells the tin-sized portions of charcoal, tells us that sometimes the smoke makes her cough, and that she gets pains in her chest, but that regardless, cooking with coal is safe. Charles, a boy of about 10, says he’ll regularly spend an hour using coal to cook his favorite food, beans.

Many of these folks cook indoors, in poorly ventilated houses. Exposure to that indoor air pollution kills 2 million people a year, most of them children. Millions more suffer from asthma and other health woes. But don’t blame Amelia or Virginia—Mozambique is one of Africa’s poorest nations, and the vast, vast majority of its residents have no access to health education. The government is woefully under-funded. And there simply aren’t any other affordable, available options for cooking fuel. However, scarcity and booming demand is driving the price of charcoal up rapidly in Maputo—the cost has doubled in just a decade.

Which is why CleanStar believes it can offer a good alternative—clean burning cookstoves fueled by ethanol derived from cassava. Those cookstoves cost $30, about 10 times as a regular cookstove (which typically run for $3-4). But they burn cleaner, create less of a mess, and, importantly, heat up instantly—charcoal stoves take between 20 and 30 minutes to fire up. And it’s these elements that CleanStar Mozambique emphasizes when its team makes the case for their stoves—not the health and environmental benefits.

CleanStar has assembled a team of local marketing strategists and salesmen to make the pitch for the superior, cleaner, and much more expensive stove. They’ve created a brand, Ndzilo, which means “fire” in the local dialect, and opened two stores in target neighborhoods to sell the stoves and the ethanol fuel. Check out Boynton’s post on the topic at Triple Pundit for an idea of how the process works.

Suffice to say that CleanStar has it’s work cut out for it—cooking with charcoal is a deeply engrained social norm that will be difficult to disrupt.

This post was originally published by TreeHugger.


Related Stories:

Obama’s Biggest Climate Decision of the Year Could Be…

Finding Solutions to Fight Malnutrition and Drought in West Africa

The State of the World’s Mothers


Photo from Brian Merchant


Duane B.
.5 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Charles B.
Charles Barnard5 years ago

Cooking w/charcoal is not, directly dangerous, cooking with any inefficiently burn fuel is dangerous.

Solar cookers are even cheaper and can be built from available scrap materials, just as soar stills can be built to provide potable water.

The power of information.

Tim C.
Tim C5 years ago


Charles B.
Charles Barnard5 years ago

Charcoal and coal are two very different things and the words should not be used interchangably.

Christine Stewart
Christine S5 years ago

This is a great idea. I am sure if they give away some of the stoves at first, to respected villagers, then the rest of the people will be interested too.

Rin S.
Rin S6 years ago

Wow, I didn't realise either.

Debbie L.
Debbie Lim6 years ago

The information needs to be spread. It's very sad that they're killing themselves slowly without knowing it.

Lauren B.


Nicole McIntyre
Nicole McIntyre6 years ago

I didn't know cooking with coal is that bad for you either. Crazy.

Vicky Pitchford
Vicky P6 years ago

horrible..those poor people