How Do You End Homelessness? If You’re This State, You Offer People Homes

As the holidays come, many of us will draw closer to friends and family, basking in their generosity, caring and warmth. For the country’s homeless, the holidays are much less friendly, and the streets are much, much colder.

What if it didn’t have to be like this? If homelessness is really, at its core, the lack of having a home, then isn’t providing a home the most elemental way to end the crisis?

That’s exactly what the state of Utah is doing. For years, Utah has addressed its homeless problem by simply offering apartments to those who lack a home, worrying about the details of the exchange later. The plan, called Housing First, was launched by then Governor Jon Huntsman and started providing apartments to the homeless in 2005. The hope was that by having a home and a caseworker to assist them, the chronically homeless would be able to regain their footing, allowing them to find it more easy to find jobs, access healthcare and other issues that are impossible without a stable address. Even if they fail to turn around their lives, however, they can still keep their new home.

What about all of those people who would say there is no such thing as a free home? Well, the cost to taxpayers, according to Utah, is far less than the costs of hospitalization or prison, actually saving the state on a per person basis. According to the state, a social worker and an apartment comes to a rough savings of $5000 per participant.

Utah projects that by the end of 2015, the state will no longer have any homeless population, having essentially eliminated homelessness within their borders. Now, Wyoming is thinking they will give the plan a try, too. For them, the need is drastic. “Wyoming has been going the opposite direction than Utah has: its homeless population has increased by 213 percent in the past three years,” writes Kerry Drake at Wyofile. “In 2012, the state managed to provide shelter for only 26 percent of the homeless, which was the lowest rate in the country. The next state on the list, at 35 percent, was California, where the climate is obviously much more conducive to sleeping outside than ours.”

The state is in the process of remodeling apartments in Casper to prepare for the first batch of selected applicants, and after that will allow roughly a dozen to launch the pilot program. For Utah, it will take about a decade to reduce the number of chronic homeless to zero. If Wyoming follows the same trajectory, it would be in the same place around 2025.

Could such a project be implemented in every state? If so, what could that do to change our entire culture when it comes to those in need? Imagine a country where state-subsidized hospital emergency rooms aren’t flooded with patients in part because of the physical and mental harms associated with living in a car or on the street? Where children would have permanent addresses to help them register for school? Where appling for a job is easier because you have a permanent address for potential employers to contact, a closet to hang clothing and an accessible shower before an interview?

For the Scrooges of the world, the idea of providing an apartment “no questions asked” is unfathomable. After all, this is a country where politicians believe elementary school children should have to sweep the cafeteria floor if they get a subsidized meal so they know there “is no such thing as a free lunch.”  Too many honestly believe that it is better to spend more in resources keeping homeless on the streets until they have somehow “earned” a hand up.

We could end homelessness if we all agreed that it is in society’s best interest to do so. The problem is, too many people still don’t think that  practicality and compassion should outweigh their conviction that the poor are poor simply because they have somehow failed morally.

Photo credit: Thinkstock


Sue H
Sue H2 months ago

Thanks for sharing.

Jim Ven
Jim Ven3 years ago

thanks for the article.

John H.
John H5 years ago

We have untold homeless, and many more on the verge, yet we have millions of homes sitting vacant. Many with POTENTIAL value and many that will never again rejoin the tax base. The rich's speculative waste that they will write off and we, the taxpayers, will pay to have monitored, kept up (to some extent) and eventually demolished.
What a cheap, frail shell game American culture has become; especially to those not grounded with a solid mindset and well-developed worldview.
240 years is a flash-in-the-pan as cultures go; my mind keeps returning to sideshow barkers and "everyone wins" games of chance. A metaphorical rut, yet I fear that's how most of the world views us; predatory and dis-honest. The game is rigged and the string along is becoming shorter.
I read from so many like-minded people this shouldn't be the case. But I guess money is power and when you control the media, well...
My one great hope is the internet.

Lynn C.
Past Member 5 years ago


Ana Marija R.
ANA MARIJA R5 years ago

copy&paste Ben O.

Brian Foster
Brian F5 years ago

Excellent idea. Since it cost $70,000 a year to incarcerate one homeless person, why not just buy them a small 500 square foot home for $30,000 on a fourth acre of land. It would save tax payers money, and provide a place to live for the downtrodden. In addition, the homeless could grow fruit trees, and grow their own vegetables, saving taxpayers more money by not having to feed them. This approach is better and cheaper than incarceration which is expensive for the taxpayers.

Katherine May Williams

Amazing. Interesting to see such a plan implemented in such a traditionally conservative place as Utah, too. I hope it works.

E. Talamante
E. Talamante5 years ago

This is a very well thought out plan, Utah! My only hope is that it will spread, successfully to other states, and provide an alternative to the poverty issue that DC is pumping out.

Perhaps this will help others realize that when you put forth an effort in good faith, good will be returned en masse.

Dennis D.
Past Member 5 years ago

Nick A. If you were ever homeless. You would understand how much contempt I have for any one that would make such a comment.

No one wants to be homeless or even on welfare. the very small percentage that is there to milk the system is a very small minority of people that conservatives and fools like to stereotype. Is any system perfect. No. But that does not mean we stop trying or that we just assume that there is no fix.

There could be and possibly we could see a start of that solution here. But just dismiss out of hand is contemptible in my opinion.

Carol Sinclair
Carol S5 years ago

Many pros to this approach as usual there is a downside. Utah is much more progressive than I thought!