I Am An Environmentalist. Yes, I DO Want to Restrict Your ‘Freedom’


Written by Sami Grover

Let’s get one thing out of the way—I am an environmentalist, and I do not believe in personal freedom as an absolute. I can already hear the cries of “I told you so!” coming from the radical anti-sustainability fringe, “these guys really are a UN-run conspiracy to turn us all into fruitarian vegans living in tiny houses/strawbale prisons.”

But first let me explain.

It’s not that I don’t believe that freedom is a crucial part of any democracy. It’s just that protecting that freedom is a complex, delicate balancing act that involves understanding what is really meant by “freedom” in the first place.

Your Freedoms Impact Mine

When Agenda 21 conspiracy theorists decry “smart growth” as an attack on personal freedom, they ignore the fact that my freedoms are restricted every single day by policies designed to promote car- and oil-centric development. When free market neoliberals cite corporate personhood as an issue of freedom of speech, they reenforce a political system where influence is not based on one person, one vote – but rather how much money you have to bend the system to your will. And when the Right Wing press decries “forcing” employees into Chevy Volts that are a perk, not a right, then they pursue about as bizarre a definition of freedom as I can imagine.

To truly defend “freedom”, we must first accept that it is not simply about getting to do whatever you please, and that one person’s freedoms can easily impinge on those of another. That’s a lesson that most of us should have learned in pre-school. Teaching your child independence does not mean letting them do what they want, but rather giving them the tools they need to negotiate increasingly complex interactions over who gets to play with which toy; whose turn it is on the swing etc.

A Difficult Balancing Act

And before the rhetoric turns to “nanny state treehuggers” once more, let’s acknowledge that these truths are hardly controversial statements, nor are they applicable only to toddlers. The issue of balancing conflicting “freedoms” is precisely why we have traffic rules, and why we don’t allow the sale of crack cocaine. We are simply in a constant dance between freedom and responsibility; regulation and empowerment. And there are no easy answers to any of it.

Our Interconnectedness is Undeniable

Even the anti-environmental crowd can be quick to call for limits to freedom when it suits them. Without discussing the rights and wrongs of the specific case, Donald Trump’s tantrum over wind turbines is a classic example that what happens on one parcel of land/ocean can have a direct impact on the interests or well-being of the people who surround it. And in a globalized world where even Conservative economists believe fossil fuels are having a ruinous impact on our economic well-being, it is time we accept our interconnectedness as an inherent component of any discussion about what freedom really means.

“Car” Is Not a Synonym for Freedom

Are Americans who find themselves trapped by high gas prices and urban sprawl any more free than Danes who are able to bike or walk without fear of imminent death? Are poor communities who live without sidewalks any more free than residents of Curitiba, Brazil who live with exceptional public transit and a real sense of community well-being? And are Germans who own their renewable energy sources less free than I am when I pay my bills to Duke Energy?

I am not suggesting we all need to become Denmark, nor that regulation can fix everything. (We don’t, and it cannot.) But to break down an exceedingly complex, challenging and important discussion about how we want to see our communities develop into a simple battle between “good” and “evil” and “freedom” versus “control” is as childish as it is ineffective.

So yes, I do want to restrict some of your freedoms. But only because you are trampling all over mine every single day.

This post was originally published by TreeHugger.


Related Stories:

The Planet Hasn’t Noticed Your Green Lifestyle

Beaches, Babes and Conservation: What’s Wrong With That?

First Environmentalism, Then Socialism!


Photo from Gavin Anderson via flickr


Mark R.
Mark R5 years ago

Outstanding article! Very well put, thanks.

Rebecca S.
Rebecca S5 years ago

thanks, so true.

LD B5 years ago

No right, including that of freedom, is absolute.

Do not unto others as you would have them not do unto you.

Alexander B.
Alex Betser5 years ago

Freedom is the fundamental principle of Universe: you can do whatever you want as long as you have enough resources. Responsibility is also resource-related principle of the Universe: every (in)action requires giving resources away. Western civilization follows those principles much more than any other present civilization: you can screw with whatever you want as long as you have a good excuse and lawyers to get away from the punishment. You can buy weapon, use strong encryption, buy lawmakers until somebody sue you ;-) It is perfectly fine and that is the least expensive way of governing the country!

Now the downside: human beings tend to blame someone else and created laws and financial system that channels all the blame and liability to least active members of our society: you - the average individual. All other mighty players like rich families, corporations, government bodies are bended laws in their favor and deploy expensive lawyers to make things work in their favor. And to make things look even worse - there are no one to stand by your side. Everyone plays for itself. So, fellow average individual .. play for yourself ;-)

Form coalitions, press your elected officials, donate, boycott, buy smart, spread the word. Fight the enemy with all legal or not prosecutable means. Basically create power players and act like ones. The only difference is that they have more money and we have more numbers so the tactics will differ slightly.

Who is the enemy? Our greed and

Lydia Price

The key to true freedom without violating the freedoms of others is to practice AHIMSA, do no harm. This works in all areas of life and is compatible with all faiths.

Bernard Cronyn
5 years ago

In terms of preventing the utter destruction of the natural environment as we know it, the most sensible and long-term restriction on so-called freedom that is required is the cessation of the financing and encouraging of the world-wide population explosion.

Mark S.
Mark S5 years ago

The only ones that restrict our freedom is the government. And they do it well.

Sharon A.
Sharon A5 years ago

With Personal Freedom comes Personal Responsibility. Until and Unless all of us accept this premise and practice responsibility, none are truly "free".

federico bortoletto
federico b5 years ago

D'accordo con questo articolo

Donna Hamilton
Donna Hamilton5 years ago

No one can ever be completely free - after all, you are not free to run around murdering whoever you feel like getting rid of!