Immigrants Boost UK Economy, Told to Go Back Home

“In the U.K. illegally? Go home or face arrest.” This none-too-subtle message was posted on six vans that were driven around north London this past summer in an attempt to publicize the U.K. Home Office’s immigration policy. While the vans were only driven around for a week, they are still generating controversy as Prime Minister David Cameron promotes his plan to reduce European Union “benefit tourism” and to limit the number of citizens from new E.U. countries (Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania) who come to the U.K. in search of work.

Cameron’s call to limit the freedom of movement of E.U. citizens is part of a larger project to push for a 2017 referendum on whether the U.K. should remain in the E.U. at all. This referendum is predicted to be a key part of the Tory Prime Minister’s election bid in 2015, notes the Independent.

Currently, citizens from a European Economic Area — from one of the member countries of the European Union — “have the right not to be treated worse than a British citizen.” In some but not all cases, they may be able to claim benefits. Cameron’s call to curb how many benefits that migrants receive is, he says, meant to put the brakes on what he calls “welfare tourism,” to cut his country’s deficit and to “[turn] round the welfare system.”

Actually, Migrants From the E.U. Help the British Economy

For all that Cameron claims such limits are “absolutely vital,” there is only inufficient evidence that migrants to the U.K. are widely abusing the system.

A joint report by the Center for Economic and Business Research and global recruitment consultancy Harvey Nash has found that restricting freedom of movement within E.U. member countries could be harmful to the British economy, causing it to lose 2 percent of its GDP by 2050, a total of some 60 billion pounds.

While Cameron says that “there is a problem with people living [here in the U.K.] and not working,” the report found that migrants from the E.U. are more likely to be working and to be more productive than U.K. citizens:

… immigrant workers are more likely to be in work (63%) than UK-born citizens (56.2%) and are more economically active. It says British businesses rely heavily on immigrant workers. Between 2003 and 2013, the number of non-British EU-born citizens employed in the UK went up from 762,000 to 1,647,000.

Albert Ellis, chief executive of the Harvey Nash Group, said: “Non-UK EU-born workers are bringing much-needed skills and value to the UK and there is little evidence that EU immigrants are having a negative impact on wages or unemployment. In fact, immigrants are helping to create jobs. A broad and diverse labour market fuels growth, as this report shows.”

Addressing the concerns that Cameron and the U.K. Home Office have raised, the European commissioner for employment and social affairs, László Andor, underscored that “policy on labor migration within the EU is based on facts rather than gut feelings or perceptions.”

In addition, a committee from the House of Lords says that, after having made “several requests” to the government for evidence about the extent of the problem of migrants abusing benefits, it has so far “failed to offer anything more than anecdotal claims to back its assertion that ‘social benefit tourism’ is a real problem.”

British Public Wary About Immigration

Cameron’s plan to curb migrants’ benefits, and those vans telling immigrants to “go home,” reflects a deep skepticism about immigration in the British public, says the New Statesman. A recent report from the Migration Observatory at Oxford University that analyzed broadsheet and tabloid coverage of immigration for the past three years found that “illegal” was the most common word used to describe immigrants.

In fact, more than the French, the Italians and the Swedes (all of whom have similar or higher levels of immigration), the British are prone to overestimate the numbers of immigrants in their country. While most guess that it is 31 percent, the real figure is near 12 percent.

The New Statesman also points out that a “persistent distrust in the management of the immigration system” remains among U.K. citizens. One such reason stems from the revelation in July that the U.K.’s Office of National Statistics had discovered that, while the Labor party was in power from 1997 to 2010, about a half a million more immigrants arrived in the U.K. from the E.U. than had previously been reported. Not surprisingly, Cameron and his Tory government have been “keen to demonstrate [their] competence in this area” and show they can get tough on migrants.

If those vans with “go home or face arrest” are taken as a sign of that “competence,” the public has good reason to hold onto its skepticism. Whoever dreamed up the “go home” vans reportedly failed to first contact the French designer of the font used on the posters and purchase a license. The designer, Fabien Delage, has indicated that he is considering suing the U.K. government. Due to his font being used, Delage notes that he is now suspected of having something to do with a campaign that has been “unpopular abroad.”

The U.K.’s Home Office needs to get its own house in order before it goes further in placing restrictions on those who, in search of work where they can find it, have left their own homes far behind.

Photo from Thinkstock


Jim Ven
Jim Ven1 years ago

thanks for the article.

Erik Roth
Ernest R4 years ago

Christina Chew has her blinders on, as usual. She still doesn't know the difference between legal and illegal. Is that the result of education? She also considers an island capable of absorbing uninvited and unlimited population increase. Heard of Easter Island, Christina? Tell us that education is the answer.


gillian brown b.
Angelflowers D4 years ago

History UK
History of England
History of Scotland
History of Wales
History of Britain
Kings and Queens of Britain
Living History
Re-enactors Directory
Events Diary
Trader's Market
Photo Gallery
Culture UK
Destinations UK

Subscribe to our Newsletter

✔ Our newest articles
✔ Monthly competitions
✔ Upcoming Living History Events
Enter your email here:

Facebook Twitter
The Last Invasion of Britain

By Ben Johnson, Editor COMMENTS

The annals of history record the name of Hastings as the site of the last invasion of Britain by Norman forces in 1066. True, this was the last successful invasion. However, little is reported about the French invasion of Fishguard, which took place in southwest Wales in 1797, nor of the brave resistance offered by Jemima Nicholas, also known as "Jemima Fawr" (Jemima the Great), who single-handedly captured twelve of the invading soldiers.

In 1797, Napoleon Bonaparte was busy conquering in central Europe. In his absence the newly formed French revolutionary government, the Directory, appears to have devised a 'cunning plan' that involved the poor country folk of Britain rallying to the support of their French liberators. Obviously the Directory had recently taken delivery of some newly liberated Brandy!

gillian brown b.
Angelflowers D4 years ago

For other uses, see British Invasion (disambiguation).
The arrival of The Beatles in the U.S., and subsequent appearance on The Ed Sullivan Show, marked the start of the British Invasion.

The British Invasion was a phenomenon that occurred in the mid-1960s when rock and pop music acts from the United Kingdom,[1] as well as other aspects of British culture, became popular in the United States, and then throughout the world. Bands such as The Beatles, The Kinks,[2] The Rolling Stones, and The Who[3] would get their start during this time and go on to make a lasting impact on the US music scene.[4]

Kate C.
Kate Collier4 years ago

I was born in England and honestly do not know what I feel about this, except I do not like our present government. Forgive me, please if this is the wrong place to say it, but i do find it offensive being called a Brit; a Briton, is fine, but it is a new vulgar expression that I find derogatory, although I am sure it is not meant to be! As for immigration, I feel our country has gone from welcoming all, to being quite racist and I am embarrassed to be a part of the way we treat some people.

Gabriella Garofalo

As far as I know, Prime Minister David Cameron gained a First class honours in PPE.

Therefore, I gather he is deeply familiar with History; has he, perchance, forgotten that once his fellow countrymen invaded just two or three countries in order to build the British Empire? Were they being immigrants too? Were they legal? Illegal? Did the inhabitants of said countries drive vans around with "none-too-subtle" messages?

Just wondering.

Katheleen Sauret
kathleen Sauret4 years ago

I don't blame them. It has really become a problem here in Sweden.

Donna Ferguson
Donna F4 years ago

I've carefully read the comments. I'm usually compassionate towards the little guy, but I must admit the Brits make good points about their "tiny island" being over-run by immigrants w/no papers who scam the system. I don't quite know what to think on this question.

Paula W.
Paula W4 years ago

No one is trying to stop people coming into the UK LEGALLY it is the ILLEGAL people we want to stop. Those who enter in lorries etc. I took over a one bedroomed flat from a local authority that had housed 6 illegal immigrants. It was eventually found that were in the country illegally and one of them had mananged to get a flat and benefits then 5 more people moved in with him.
They were found out and stopped and we took the flat as we needed a ground floor falt due to disabilities. We had waited 5 years to get a flat and these people had been in the falt we now have for 6 years so I can understand why people are so angry.
We need workers in different fields of work and if they come from other countries that is fine provided they are here legally

Margaret Goodman
Margaret G4 years ago

I admit ignorance about the situation in the UK and EU. In the United States, I agree with the thought, "Republicans are addicted to having cheap labor. Democrats are addicted to obtaining new voters." Possibly the same situation holds in the UK and EU.

I wonder if social services are stretched, and, if so, is that the fault of the immigrants, legal and illegal, or is it due to the fact that taxes on the rich and corporations are, by my lights, way too low?