In Defense of Village Idiots


Written by Will Wlizlo

Although it pains me to even type these words, new research from Princeton University suggests that the least informed citizens provide a crucial damper on our democratic process. Ecology professor Iain Couzin used a model animal that, on the whole, is more intelligent that about 30 percent of Americans: fish.

The experiment involved golden shiner fish, which innately are drawn to the color yellow (as many humans are drawn to the ice cream freezer at the grocery store or to cable news channels on the television). Couzin and his fellow researchers trained a number of them to swim against their nature prefer the color blue instead. “In experiments where a minority of fish was trained to swim toward a yellow target,” reports Miller-McCune, “and a majority toward a blue target, the minority swayed the whole group more than 80 percent of the time.” Think of these as the “informed” actors in a democracy who have a very specific, possibly extreme, goal for the country.

When the research team introduced “uninformed” fish—those that hadn’t been turned-on to blue—the crowd did something surprising. “Adding those individuals dramatically changes the outcome of group decision-making,” Couzin told Miller-McCune. “They inhibit the minority and support the majority view, and this allows the majority to be heard and that view to dominate.” The views of the Ron Pauls and Dennis Kuchiniches of the fish world get drowned out for something a little more moderate—and in line with the wants of the majority.

“But these are fish!” you say. That’s true, and Couzin concedes as much. But, the researchers point out, as a citizen crowd, we have much in common with Couzin’s model. Humans, Miller-McCune points out, have “the ability to influence and be influenced by each other. We also have the capacity for strong opinion.”

The implication of this study could be very transformative about how we behave in large groups. If Couzin’s experiment shows similar results on human subjects, it will have the “potential to knock down a bit of conventional wisdom about how people make group decisions — that is, that uninformed people are easily swayed by the loudest voice in the room, enabling extreme minority views to spread.”

This post was originally published by the Utne Reader.


Related Stories:

Has the GOP Become a Cult?

Tea Party Group Urges Small Businesses ‘Not To Hire A Single Person’ to Hurt Obama

What If the Tea Party Wins?


Photo from Benson Kua via flickr


Marianne C.
Marianne C6 years ago

Isn't teaching the little fishies to swim into the predator's mouth kinda mean?

Oh, wait -- I get it. This research was funded by the predators. Kind of like Republican-supported voter education.

Jamie Clemons
Jamie C6 years ago

village idiots whether democrat or republican should not be elected as a reprehensible or president.

Jackie D.
Jackie D6 years ago

What's next? Look up Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority. Scary stuff.

june t.
reft h6 years ago

thanks for the article - the comments were fun to read

Kathy Perez
Kathy J6 years ago

thanks for the article. some of the comments are humorous :)

Winn Adams
Winn A6 years ago

Good grief. What's next?

Deborah L.
Deborah L6 years ago

they wasted money on this. if they wanted the answers they could have gotten them long ago, just look to the people in church on Sunday, they don't call them SHEEPLE for nothing.

Past Member
Past Member 6 years ago

Seriously, does anyone else see how they are trying to con you here? They trained one group to go with their inborn instructions and the other against them. Minority or majority, the ones trained to follow their instinct will always sway those trained to go against it. This example is designed to sway your opinion in the direction that "they" want it to go.

Patrick F.
Patrick f6 years ago

Why would we be defending the GOP party? They are truly the village idiots....

Mark Stevenson
Mark S6 years ago

I disagree. Only idiots would vote republican (unless they are billionaires).