Lawmakers In Other States Claim They Have No Idea They Are Mandating Vaginal Probes

Transvaginal ultrasounds.  Non-consensual vaginal probing.  State-sanctioned rape.  These phrases became the weapons in the latest battle of the war on women, as the Virginia Republicans’ attempt to add more onerous pre-abortion restrictions turned into a fight over the personal bodily rights of those who seek to terminate pregnancies.

According to the Washington Post, the issue turned the moment that “transvaginal ultrasound” hit the legislative floor.  Bill sponsors, admitting that they had no idea that most early abortions would require a vaginal ultrasound in order to determine a fetus’s gestational age, suddenly found themselves not simply forcing women to look at pictures of their potential babies and then sit for another 24 hours to hope they change their minds.  Instead, they were mandating the government literally force themselves into women’s lives, and bodies, a message that didn’t play nearly as well.

So will this public outcry effect the legislation in other states?  Pennsylvania is also considering passing a mandatory ultrasound bill, and of course, legislators are now on record saying they had no idea they were forcing women to undergo transvaginal ultrasounds.

Including the bill’s sponsor.

“[Rep. Rob]Kauffman said he does not believe the bill’s intent is to mandate a transvaginal procedure.

“That is how those who oppose this bill are going to try to oppose it, but I don’t believe it’s accurate,” he said. “A traditional ultrasound is the method used for this legislation. There is absolutely no requirement for the transvaginal. If nothing is found, they move on.”

Kauffman said the bill doesn’t specifically refer to either type of ultrasound because transabdominal is “the accepted method” and transvaginal “is not the accepted method.” He said he asked [Rep. Kathy] Rapp, who introduced the bill, about the possibility of a transvaginal procedure and “she said she had never heard of it.”

Keller also said he was unaware that an internal ultrasound procedure might be required under the legislation.

“I’ll have to double check that. That would cause me some concern if that’s part of it,” he said. “You’ve brought up a question that I’ll be checking with staff on the health committee.”

Iowa has already stripped the “transvaginal” requirement from their proposed ultrasound bill.  And in Alabama, where the fight over whether or not a transvaginal ultrasound would be used is now hitting the capital, the Republican sponsor of the bill is claiming erroneously that an abdominal ultrasound can provide the information required from law six weeks or earlier in an attempt to avoid the “probing” blacklash (note, it can’t).

Would these politicians have rejected the bill if they knew that the ultrasound needed to be done manually?  For most of them, if they could have been sure that no one called them on it, the answer is likely no.  For those who believe that the right to life of an embryo, fetus, or even fertilized egg outweighs any physical or emotional trauma that a woman may experience, forcing a probing in order to try to get her to not abort would seem like nothing.  After all, these are people who believe a woman should have to undergo the physical discomfort, pain, and potential complications of pregnancy, regardless of it the baby is viable, the age of the woman or girl, if she wishes to be a mother, or if she got pregnant against her will.  In comparison to that, a transvaginal ultrasound is almost nothing.

But the public reaction to their stance, their unwillingness to admit that they don’t care if the means are physically invasive if it forms another roadblock, is what shocked Virginia into backing down, and can do the same in other states, just as long as the pressure remains on them to stop literally invading women’s bodies.


Vaiva G.
Vaiva G5 years ago

i understand that politicians can't read all the bills before them... but with something as important as this can't their aides highlight important phrases like that for them??? or maybe lawmakers should stop legislating a woman's right to choose into oblivion...

Annmari Lundin
Annmari L5 years ago

Lee W. 8:39 AM PST on Feb 27, 2012 :
Would like to give you a thousands stars but are only allowed to give one!

Tahni W5 years ago

So they would rather admit they are too stupid to read than admit that they just don't care...

Sandi C. A bunch of greedy, ignorant, hypocritical men in government trying to take away the rights I already have, and have always had is a REAL PROBLEM!!

trina firey
Trina D. firey5 years ago

The goal of the GOP is to strip all but themselves of a quality life.

Lika S.
Lika P5 years ago

Oh. Maw. Gawd. They've never heard of transvaginal ultrasound? That's been out since at least 2000 or before.

We, as a nation, have bigger things to worry about. So here we are, with a flat economy. More homes are being foreclosed and more people than ever in need of livable jobs and/or assistance. We're told not to have children we can't afford, yet when that happens, they want to make it illegal to do something about it...

How about staying out of the issue, because this is a pro-choice nation, and worry about ensuring that there are enough jobs to go around? A better economy = fewer abortions. it's a win/win situation.

Lydia Price


Robert H.
Robert Hamm5 years ago

all this proves is most of them aren't bothering to read the bills before they got on them. They aren't representing at all, they are following their majority leaders dictates.

yana dimitrova
yana dimitrova5 years ago


Lynda Duke
Lynda Duke5 years ago

A state lawmaker tells the doctor it HAS to shove an object up my vagina - that is state mandated RAPE!

Lee Witton
5 years ago

...seeing Progressives take action to restore our great country, inclusive of "all men and women are created equal" (we're willing to give you the benefit of doubt).