London Schools Can No Longer Discriminate Based on Faith

You’ve attended a church for years – maybe even a lifetime. You faithfully show up for Mass on Sundays, you volunteer when they ask you, and you pay your dues when they ask for collections. You want your child, now school-aged, to attend the school affiliated with the church. It makes sense that your family should be given priority over other applicants, right?

However, we cannot assume that all people are faithful like that. What about the people who abuse the power or privilege that comes with being a long-standing member of an institution like a powerful church? What about the people who just start coming to Mass out of the blue just to get their kids into the church’s prestigious school? Should they be afforded the same priority?

The London Oratory School, one of London’s most prestigious faith-based schools, has been battling this for years. A recent ruling has finally told them that they cannot discriminate based on faith when it comes to their admissions process.

Before this ruling, the school required that families who wanted their children admitted to the school volunteered with the church in several ways for three years before the child could be even considered for admission. While getting involved with your church is not bad in and of itself, it is when you consider that this is, in fact, a form of discrimination. By saying that children cannot be admitted into this incredibly prestigious school — so prestigious that Tony Blair selected it for his children — if they are not Catholic. Or if they don’t pretend to be Catholic.

Faith-based discrimination has been allowed for so long because schools attached to churches often don’t receive government funding. As such, they don’t have to do what the government tells other, public schools to do, from discrimination at admissions to standardized testing to adopting educational standards the government puts out. It’s no wonder these schools are so wildly successful, considering they can choose whoever they want to attend (and kick whoever they want out) and don’t have the same ways of measuring success as public institutions.

Is this success, though? Having students surrounded by people who religiously believe the same thing as they do and being taught the same beliefs in classes, are their minds ever opened to other possibilities? Are their beliefs ever challenged, thus molding and shaping the way they view the world, whether solidifying those beliefs or changing them? I’d argue no. It’s also ridiculous to think that these students will not, one day, be confronted with people who think differently from them. How will they ever learn to interact in a healthy way with someone whose belief set is different than their own?

The ruling that London schools like The London Oratory School cannot discriminate based on faith might shatter some people’s views of the private school system in London, but it is a good thing. Students of all beliefs will now have the same opportunities at a prestigious education, and they will be exposed to more than just their own beliefs. Hospitals and libraries cannot discriminate based on faith, so schools shouldn’t be able to, either.

Photo Credit: Phil Whitehouse


Sue Matheson
Sue Matheson4 years ago


Ruhee B.
Ruhee B4 years ago

This school isn't a private school ie you don't need to pay to go there. It is one of the best performing schools in terms of exam success therefore there is a huge demand for places. For most cases of good high schools (except the ones who select on academic ability) people have to live on the doorstep to get a place. There is NO truly fair way to get your child into an outstanding state secondary school here.

Jess No Fwd Plz K.
Jessica K4 years ago

If this is a private school with private funding, it should be able to choose its applicants as it pleases. Once it receives public funding, that's an entirely different story.

Cathleen K.
Cathleen K4 years ago

This is a BS decision, and the school should appeal. In the meantime, set up a two tiered pricing scheme - one for members and one for non members. Charge non member five times as much. Problem solved.

Lynnl C.
Lynn C4 years ago


Mary H.
Mary H.4 years ago

Mary L.: You said: I cannot think of any reason I would want a child I care about to go to a school that is this offensive school.

Whyever not? The academics are good; that's why people want their kids to attend. Is it, perhaps, because the child would be taught things YOU think are harmful? Maybe you don't want the child influenced by the other children in the school. Mary, that is exactly why people send their children TO such schools. So you are committing the same prejudice of which you accuse people of faith.

Read more:

Ken W.
Ken W4 years ago


Winn Adams
Winn A4 years ago


Colin M.
Colin MacKenzie4 years ago

So can I now sent my little girl to the Islamic primary school just down the road from my house?
Of course I can't.
This is more evidence of "positive discrimination" against Christians, in favour of other faiths, namely islam.
Even if the law states that she is permitted to attend the school she would have to follow their religious practices, let alone the torrent of abuse she would get from other pupils and the teachers.

Bill K.
Bill K4 years ago

Good. we need more of this in the US.