Memo to Romney: America’s Greatest Presidents All Used Government to Increase Prosperity


Written by David Woolner

In his Wisconsin primary victory speech, presidential aspirant Mitt Romney made some interesting observations about Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and Abraham Lincoln. He seemed to indicate that he admires them, as they were what he termed “historically great” presidents. He then went on to chide the current president for having the audacity to think of himself in the same league as these three great former leaders. He described the coming presidential election at great length as a historic choice between what he termed a “government-centered society” and a “society led by free people and free enterprises.”

In making these observations, Mr. Romney made no attempt to rectify the fundamental contradiction in his remarks. He either failed to see, or decided to conveniently ignore, the fact that the three “historically great” presidents (one Republican and two Democratic) he made reference to at the opening of his remarks all shared one thing in common: a fundamental belief in the positive use of government to help expand the economy and provide a greater degree of economic opportunity and social justice for all Americans — not just those at the top of the income ladder.

It was President Lincoln, for example, who in 1862 signed such pieces of legislation as the Homestead Act, which issued 160 acres of Federal land west of the Mississippi River at little or no cost to any adult citizen who had not borne arms against the United States, provided they agreed to improve the land. He also signed the Morill Act, which donated 30,000 acres of federal land to a number of states and territories that could then be sold by the state to provide the revenue needed to fund public colleges and universities. The result was the establishment of over 60 “land-grant” colleges and universities across the country, including Cornell University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Wisconsin at Madison (the very state in which Mr. Romney made his remarks about the evils of a “government-centered” society). The Homestead Act greatly accelerated the settlement of U.S. territory in the West and was a boon to the overall economy. The establishment of “land-grant” colleges and universities brought the dream of higher education to tens of thousands of low-income farmers and workers who had previously been denied that opportunity, which had untold benefits in science, technology, and the liberal arts.

FDR brought us the most comprehensive banking and financial reform in U.S. history. He established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and a number of other important laws that restored confidence in the country’s financial and banking sector not only among the American people, but also among the business community. In using government in this way, the Roosevelt administration laid the basis for the overall growth of the financial sector for decades to come. FDR also greatly expanded the country’s economic infrastructure through a massive effort to update the country’s antiquated roads, bridges, airports, and other facilities, all of which helped propel the expansion of the economy in the 1930s, ’40s, ’50s, and beyond. He also signed the National Labor Relations Act into law, which encouraged higher wages through the unionization of the workforce and, near the end of his life, pushed through the GI Bill, which allowed thousands of returning World War II veterans the chance to secure further job training or access to higher education. Both of those efforts helped make the post-1945 U.S. economy the envy of the world.

The Johnson administration gave us the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act of 1964 and ‘65, which began the long, slow process of ending racial discrimination in America. It gave us Medicare and Medicaid to provide the elderly and low-income individuals with access to health care. Head Start and the Higher Education Act of 1965 helped low-income families secure a better education for their children. The Truth-in-Lending Act helped protect consumers from abusive lending practices. These and a host of other initiatives were designed to build a “Great Society” that would provide everyday Americans with a greater measure of social security and economic opportunity.

In short, all of these “historically great” presidents used government as a tool to improve the lives of working Americans through a host of important initiatives that not only helped render the United States a more just and equitable society, but also helped expand our economy by increasing the level of economic opportunity.

Ignoring all of this, Mr. Romney insists that it is only “free enterprise” and the “free enterprise system” that can lift people out of poverty, educate our kids, and build a strong middle class. He claims that this is the one true path to economic prosperity and as such says he is running for president because he wants to “restore to America the economic values of freedom and limited government that has made us the powerhouse of the world.”

But in making this claim, Mr. Romney misreads our history. There is no question that the United States and the American people have benefited tremendously over the years from the fruits of the free enterprise system. But the notion that our government has not played a major part in this success story ignores the facts. Ask yourself where we might be today without the innovations of such institutions as MIT or Cornell University, if our banking system was not backed by the FDIC, or what sort of social security system we might have if we had turned over the Social Security Trust Fund to the private equity markets prior to the recent financial crisis. Also ask yourself if you really think the financial sector would be better off without the SEC or if it really is fair that Warren Buffett’s secretary pays a higher rate of tax than her employer.

History teaches us that the true story of America is one of enlightened leadership in the creative use of government to unleash the creative energies of the American people. History also reminds us that the free market, left unchecked, can bring the country to financial ruin. Mr. Romney refuses to acknowledge this. Instead, he claims that President Obama is wrong to focus so much of his attention on finding government-led solutions to our current problems. Meanwhile, he mocks him for even attempting to aspire to the greatness of a Lincoln, Roosevelt, or Johnson — the three of our presidents who, perhaps more than any others, understood that there are times when, as FDR put it, the American citizen, in seeking to rectify economic inequality and injustice, “could only appeal to the organized power of government.”

This post was originally published by the Roosevelt Institute.


Related Stories:

Obama on 2012: This Is Going To Be “Fun”

The Real Mitt Wants to Be “Unzipped” Is “Waiting To Come Out”

Romney’s New House Has Its Own Lobbyist


Photo from the White House Press Office via Wikimedia Commons


Glenn M.
Glenn Meyer5 years ago

Tax breaks for the, so called, “job creators,” cannot work in a “global economy.” The jobs being created are those being sent overseas. That is the incentive. Innovation and job creation won’t stop the artificial removal of jobs from the U.S. and therefore cannot create national prosperity. Education will not help either. The price differential for the educated is equally disparate and those jobs are already being sent to other countries.

Corporations have over-powered our government which now believes that out-sourcing and off-shoring of U.S. jobs is inevitable and necessary with expectations that the middle class should fall on their swords. It is the underlying cause of the financial collapse and borders on national security with the loss of our middle class tax base. Yet, this nation does nothing, not even demand it be restricted or disincentivized by whatever method. International businesses are doing the UN-AMERICAN activity of destroying U.S. salaries, U.S. businesses that hire in the U.S., and as an end result, destroying the U.S. marketplace while still demanding BUSINESS ENTITLEMENTS and protections for themselves.

Infrastructure spending and tax breaks will not replace enough jobs to keep up with the hemorrhaging loss of U.S. jobs from out-sourcing over seas. Neither party will do anything about it unless we begin grass roots efforts to protest out-sourcing and off-shoring of U.S. jobs. If nothing is done we will deserve w

Donald T.
Donald T5 years ago

Why be an insider? Because the big bribery money is inside.

Bill Reese
Bill Reese5 years ago

It does appear that Rommey will be the challenger in November, but it is still not a done deal until after the convention.

Obama is the biggest spending president in history and he want to spend more. He has told more lies than any president in history and they all have told some lies.

I will try to get his total spending package on here for all to see with the proper credits by Friday.

Frances C.
Frances C5 years ago

Willard Mitt Romney has ran so far to the right, the far right, he will be unable to ever find his way back to sanity.

Obama Biden 2012!

Ariel P.
Ariel P5 years ago

@Bill R. The above article is not about presidential spending, why are you off the topic and bringing that up? Romney's remarks in no way address spending, am I missing something?

According to Wikipedia, the US public debt has increased over $500 billion each year since fiscal year 2003 (that's 6 six years of W.), and the largest increase were during the Great Depression and WW II, the FDR and Truman presidencies. With that, I'm done feeding the troll.

Bill Reese
Bill Reese5 years ago

I am shocked that care2 would bring up the question of presidental spending when Obama has put every man worman and child in debt to the tune of some $70,000 dollars.
I will take a couple of days and work out the debt ratio per president to the GDP while they were in office.

Someone on this site was not thinking when they mentioned, " Obama inherited his presidency from the worst president in the history of the USA!" What happened to Carter, did he have a new make over? What happened to the drunk Harding, or Useless Grant as all three of those would run close seconds to Obama or maybe not too close as he still has 8 months to go.

Jim Gayden
Jim Gayden5 years ago

Steve P. Obama inherited his presidency from the worst president in the history of the USA!

Luvenia V.
Luvenia V5 years ago

Steve P., “IF” what you say is true and Romney does become our next President I think TRUE Americans should hold a week long period of mourning, mourning the death of America. We should take down our beloved flags, fold them and put them in a place of honor so we can remember what America used to stand for. Women can use this time to buy up Aspirin and batteries for their toys and men can invest in Soap On a Rope because women that Care about themselves and the future of America will be cutting WAY back on having sex even the married ones.

Corporate America which is what we will officially become will be the LAST stop before we enter 1984. I am sure people like you will neither know nor care when we enter 1984. You won’t have to think for yourself, in fact original thought will be against the law. I am sure that corporate puppets like you will be given a job in high standing so hang in there Steve but do practice bowing as you are going to be doing a LOT of that.

Dorothy W.
D. Wiese Jones5 years ago

Romney is never going to be president.

Jeffrey Y.
Jeffrey Yan5 years ago

We don't need a president who claimed his fortune by M&A, cutting down the national workforce and move jobs overseas, who benefited himself by paying low percentage through the "tax system". A good president not only ran an efficient government during his administration, but we also need to look at what he has left behind after his term(s).