No, the #MeToo Movement is Not a Witch Hunt

Irish actor Liam Neeson is just the latest to describe the #MeToo movement as “a bit of a witch hunt.”

I know quite a bit about witch hunts of the past, since I’ve been researching my ancestor Alice Molland who was the last person executed for witchcraft in England, in 1684. Along with most of the tens of thousands of people accused of being witches in early modern Europe, she was female and an outsider, with little power. She was accused of “witchcraft on the bodies” of three people, causing them to die. Other so-called “witches” were accused of causing the harvest to fail, keeping a toad as a familiar and killing off pigs. All the testimony was hearsay.

The witch trials in Europe and England involved innocent people, mostly women, who were powerless against the state and the church, and who were hanged, drowned or burned. 

There have been plenty more modern-day witch hunts since then. The Holocaust, the internment of the Japanese in the U.S., and McCarthyism are all examples, since they entailed the systematic persecution of powerless people.

So let’s be clear: the #MeToo movement is not a witch hunt.

In fact, the #MeToo movement is the very antithesis of a witch hunt: it’s a coming together of people who have been exploited, wronged and harassed to fight against established powers that have perpetrated these wrongs. 

A witch hunt involves people in power targeting those with no power and blaming them for what’s wrong.

Yet Liam Neeson is not alone in seeking to make this comparison.

Writing in “Pacific Standard,” David M.Perry provides this example: 

“Former Minnesota Governor Arne Carlson wrote on behalf of former Senator Al Franken: ‘I firmly believe in due process, which is a cornerstone of our democratic way of living. Whenever in history we abandoned it, we severely damaged ourselves. Just think about the lynching of blacks in the Southern, the internment of people of Japanese descent in World War II, or the era of McCarthyism when lives were destroyed based solely on allegations.’”

These historical events are examples of modern-day witch hunts; asking the a U.S. Senator, someone with a great deal of power, to resign because of allegations of sexual harassment, is not.

Margaret Atwood, author of the dystopian “The Handmaid’s Tale,” is another critic who doesn’t seem to get this difference. Atwood has expressed concern that there will be no due process for the accused harassers. This follows her actions last year when she signed an open letter calling for due process for a University of British Columbia professor who was facing allegations of sexual misconduct.

Her comments brought many responses including this one on twitter:

“In today’s dystopian news: One of the most important feminist voices of our time shits on less powerful women to uphold the power of her powerful male friend.”

French actress Catherine Deneuve also drew heavy criticism when she signed on to an open letter published in the French newspaper “Le Monde” declaring that the #MeToo movement was taking things too far.

Along with more than 100 other women from the worlds of entertainment and academia, she rejected a type of feminism that could lead to “a hatred of men.”

She appeared to pull back a little this week and apologized to “victims of horrible acts…and to them alone.”

However, Deneuve also implies that men and women will lose their sense of fun in flirting because of #Metoo.

This makes no sense. As  sums up in The Guardian, the accusations of sexual misconduct include:

“Louis CK masturbating in front of non-consenting women. Harvey Weinstein ejaculating on to a woman’s nightclothes after raping her. ‘Things’ done by men who lied, insulted, threatened, cornered, touched up, fingered, groped, squeezed and penetrated those whose power and status were less than their own.”

These are the violent acts of the powerful taking advantage of the powerless. 

Flirting has nothing to do with sexual harassment. Good flirting is mutually pleasurable, a subtle way of building desire, but it only happens when two people are paying very close attention to each other. It’s a respectful and playful exchange resulting in both sides feeling good.

Sexual harassment, the concern of the #MeToo movement, is about one person forcing his will on another person with no regard for that person’s desire.

Let’s keep our attention on the victims and the powerless and stop using “witch hunt” unless that’s really what we mean.

Photo Credit: Screenshot from vimeo online video

71 comments

Jack Y
Jack Yabout a month ago

thanks

SEND
Jack Y
Jack Yabout a month ago

thanks

SEND
John J
John Jabout a month ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
John J
John Jabout a month ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
Paulo R
Paulo Rabout a month ago

ty

SEND
Paulo R
Paulo Rabout a month ago

ty

SEND
Mike R
Mike R1 months ago

Thanks

SEND
Mike R
Mike R1 months ago

Thanks

SEND
Mike R
Mike R1 months ago

Thanks

SEND
Deborah W
Deborah W3 months ago

ALLEGEDLY always gets my attention, permanently diluting the issue unless documented ... and not years, even decades later, for some people DO SHAPE UP. Still, coming forward often presents just enough harm and questions to make one wonder. Personally believe the money's good if sensational enough to bring headlines ... just ask Karen McDougal. And what about those as yet not "caught". Would love to see media investigate their competition for the big story and top headline. Or is the brotherhood just too big, and the sisterhood too small?

SEND