Polling Shows How Impossible It Is to Actually Poll on Abortion

Abortion continues to remain a highly contentious issue — but is it as contentious as we think it is? With the latest extreme abortion bans sweeping through state legislatures, polling on the actual issue of abortion varies wildly — often depending on who asks the questions, how those questions are framed and which outlet does the reporting.

The end result? A mishmash of results that are unreliable at best — and outright misleading at worst.

Take recent reporting on Fox News after the Alabama “no exceptions” total abortion ban passed. According to Raw Story, the news anchor leadingly asked Americans United for Life director Catherine Glenn Foster, “Why are the Democrats, why are the media, why are they hitting so hard against these states [passing abortion bans] when this is what the voters want?”

Of course, these measures aren’t what voters want. Fox is attempting to use the results from the 2018 Amendment 2 vote to claim Alabama voters want a total abortion ban with no exceptions – but the vote didn’t focus on an abortion ban, per se; it aimed to add “personhood” language to the state constitution. Even as legislators campaigned on the ballot initiative, voters were repeatedly reminded that as long as Roe v. Wade was in place, this would have no impact on legal abortion in Alabama.

How little does the Amendment 2 vote reflect what voters in Alabama really think about a total, no exceptions abortion ban? According to Vox.com, polling from 2018 shows that when asked about eliminating the ability to get an abortion in all cases, voter support dropped to just around 30 percent.

Vox explains:

Overall, however, the numbers reveal that while a majority of Alabamians do oppose abortion, most believe in a rape or incest exception at the very least (as do most Americans, as Vox’s Anna North explains). The plurality of respondents (29 percent) said abortion should be legal only in cases of rape, incest, or if the life of the woman is in danger; 20 percent said abortion should be legal in most cases, and 16 percent said that abortion should be legal in all cases. In other words, the poll found 65 percent of Alabamians think rape and incest victims should have access to abortion.

Opposition to so-called “heartbeat” bans, which ban abortion as early as two weeks after a missed period, is almost as unpopular. Or at least, it is once respondents are clear of exactly what the restrictions mean.

Amanda Michelle Gomez reports for Think Progress:

When [Kaiser Family Foundation] asked people whether they’d support their own state enacting a law like Ohio’s, the public is pretty divided. A larger share (50%) of the overall public said they supported the ban, whereas 44% said they opposed it. There is a pretty stark difference along party lines: 70% of Republicans support the ban; 27% of Democrats support the ban; and 53% of Independents support the ban. Republican women are more supportive (77%) of the ban than Republican men (64%).

But when people learn that “heartbeat” bans actually amount to outlawing abortion as early as six weeks into pregnancy, before many women and gender minorities know they are pregnant and so add up to a near-total ban, 12% changed their mind and said they opposed the restrictions.

Of course, that’s the exact reason why abortion opponents had been couching their bills in misleading language like “fetal heartbeat” — note, it’s not a heartbeat, but rather cardiac activity at six weeks, and it’s not even a fetus until 10 weeks of pregnancy –  or “unborn pain” or “born alive infant” for so long.

Each of these labels is meant not just to evoke an emotional response, but also to muddy the waters on what the bills actually do and how early in gestation they go into effect.

Why haven’t we seen a full no-exceptions abortion ban before this? Because there’s absolutely no way to hide what the right has proposed and just how devastating it would be if enacted.

And as we’ve long seen both nationally and locally, when it comes to a complete ban with no exceptions, almost no one supports that sort of restriction — except for the very extremists that tend to propose it.

Photo credit: Robin Marty/Flickr

40 comments

Lara A
Lara A4 days ago

Thank you for sharing.

SEND
Ganaisha Calvin
Ganaisha Calvin6 days ago

it's hard to be scientific when emotions get in the way

SEND
Winn A
Winn A16 days ago

Petition Signed

SEND
Leo C
Leo C17 days ago

Thank you for posting!

SEND
Paul B
Paul B17 days ago

Pam, you should watch the new movie "unplanned." It shows an entirely different aspect to that "lump of cells." at a fairly early stage, it does feel pain. At 20 weeks, the brain is functioning, neural connections are formed... it is basically a human being. At 30 weeks, its nearly viable outside the womb. Not sure what SCIENCE you are referring to, but I think you have been misled.

SEND
Kay B
Kay B18 days ago

If a fetus has no connection to a 9 month old genuine baby then a 9 month old genuine baby has no connection with a 20 year old adult. So...? They are all human life at different stages, whether you call them fetus, baby, adult, or grandpa.

SEND
pam w
pam w18 days ago

I work at Planned Parenthood. Let me say with AUTHORITY (been there!) that a fetus is NOT a baby! Sonograms show an incomplete little thing which has no connection with a 9-month genuine BABY. A fetus has no functioning brain, no sentience, no neural completion and cannot feel pain! THAT is SCIENCE! So all you anti-choice people are just...not understanding. (I'd have phrased that differently if I didn't want to insult your intelligence.)

SEND
Leo C
Leo C18 days ago

Thank you for sharing!

SEND
Paul B
Paul B18 days ago

Alea C... but it is a baby, not just a clump of cells. You would know that if you've ever seen a sonagram.

Tanya W. Too bad that baby can't speak up on the decision.

SEND
Caitlin L
Caitlin L19 days ago

tyfs

SEND