Who Is Responsible For Creating the Las Vegas Shooters?

When it comes to the story of Jerad and Amanda Miller, the married couple who allegedly went on a shooting spree, killing two police officers and one bystander in what is being called “a display of antigovernment violence,” those who may have been the most responsible for instigating the violence have remained oddly silent.

The Millers — who left social media messages declaring the beginning of a “revolution,” told the same to neighbors prior to their attack, and draped a body of a slain officer in a “Don’t Tread on Me” flag emblematic of the Tea Party — may have been planning something much larger than the original assault. A police search of their home uncovered “numerous papers including detailed plans to take over a courthouse and execute public officials,” according to the New York Times, and now an investigation is open to see who else they may potentially have been in talks with when it came to overthrowing authority.

That’s got some on the right nervous, apparently, especially those who were embracing the anti-government tactics of the armed militia groups gathering at Bundy Ranch in Nevada. The Bundy Ranch incident pitted Cliven Bundy and a plethora of Tea Party, anti-government activists against the federal authorities, who were trying to round up cattle that the rancher had been illegally grazing on public lands for decades while refusing to pay fees or move them when they endangered local animal habitats. The government eventually caved to Bundy and his followers, fearing violence could break out otherwise, especially once advocate Richard Mack declared that they would put unarmed women in front to act as human shields if gunfire broke out.

The Millers were initially at that standoff at the ranch, but now Bundy-folk are trying to play that down. Although Jerad stated in a video that they were made to leave because he had been convicted of a felony, Tea Party activists are trying to say they were sent away because he appeared so obviously unhinged. “Some on the political left are attempting to pin this on the Tea Party movement thanks to the alleged use of Gadsden Flag symbolism and the man’s apparent claim that he was at Bundy Ranch. I would say that a Nazi Peter Pan meth user conspiracy theorist cop killer is more than likely simply unhinged, and like so many who are dangerously mentally ill, he grabbed bits and pieces of whatever ideological movement was available in the area to fold inside his messed up head. I suspect that we’ll find out that the same general picture applies to the female murderer,” writes one.

Richard Mack himself seemed more understanding that an armed militia movement in a standoff against police could in fact logically encourage some members to branch off into anti-government violence on their own. When confronted by Hatewatch about the Millers being at the ranch, Mack responded, “Oh, no. I was afraid that he might have been at the Bundy ranch. As soon as I heard about it, I was afraid of that.”

Whether Miller was an addict, had underlying mental issues, or was acting of his own free will and with sound mind, there is little doubt that, just as the anti-abortion movement works up these alleged “lone wolf” attackers and then backs away, claiming that the people instigating the violence had nothing to do with them, anti-government groups do the exact same thing. In both cases, advocates work their followers into a frenzy against an “other” who must be eliminated in order to bring about victory, then wipes their hands when actual violence occurs, claiming that there must have been something else that caused those people to do such horrible acts, and they themselves hold no responsibility.

Yes, it was the Millers who allegedly did the shooting, believing that there was a revolution that they were advancing and their actions were simply the first step to bring it about. But it was the far right extremists who told them that guns and the threat of violence is the way to bring the government to its knees and take back its authority that really set the Millers into action. The question is, how many other “Millers” are waiting to do the same?

Photo credit: Thinkstock


Jim Ven
Jim Ven1 years ago

thanks for the article.

LucyKaleido ScopeEyes

From Salon, Tuesday, Jul 22, 2014:

" “A much larger and more dangerous movement”: Right-wing militias thrive post-Bundy — and the media won’t talk about it - Cliven Bundy wasn't a one-off. New report shows far-right militias are growing, and more fear of home-grown terror"


From LATimes, July 11, 2014 :
"Bundy ranch standoff galvanized right-wing radicals, report says" @http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-bundy-ranch-report-20140711-story.html

The report, "War in the West: The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right," from the Southern Poverty Law Center @http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/War-in-the-West-The-Bundy-Ranch-Standoff-and-the-American-Radical-Right

Jenny Sejansky
Jenny Sejansky3 years ago

Unfortunately, no one is to blame but the shooters. Are there really any politicians condoning the actions of this couple? Is anyone actually standing up on FOX or MSNBC or any other news source, saying the Millers are heroes? Not to my knowledge. Naturally, they would NEVER come out and own what they instigate.

Jennifer H.
Jennifer H3 years ago

I just don't understand the mentallity of it all. The Miller's & Bundy & Richard Mack. What lunatics. Violence like this is never an answer, it just divides us further.

Robert Hamm
Robert Hamm3 years ago

Exactly Ros its much EASIER to plarize us than it is to come up with solutions. Specially when the monied people dont LIKE the solutions.

Dennis D.
Past Member 3 years ago

This is up to Iraq to solve. The oil be d@mned. If the republican/tea party want to President Obama to go in to this donnybrook. It is only because the party of no want to try to to paint him as a war monger.

no the Iraqis are going to have to stand or fall on their own.. Which as memory serves is what the Iraqi Government want when our forces left.

Patti Ruocco
Patti Ruocco3 years ago

If they weren't part of a group, no group should be held responsible for their brainwashing or their actions. The concept of being responsible for our own decisions is what America is about. We choose what to program our brains with, whether it be balanced left and right media, video games, or religions.... It is still OUR choice.

Robert Hamm
Robert Hamm3 years ago

Adam NO ONE including these two people lives in a vacuum. Societal and madia pressure shape us all. Yes they are ultiamtely respoonsible. But the atmosphere of the media etc all effect us. WE are too polarized along ideological lines and the lines are getting much farther apart.

Adam L.
Adam L3 years ago

The article asks who is responsible, who is to blame? A fair question, but one that should be self evident. The 2 people that did the shootings. The problem with liberals and progressives is they are always, always, looking to blame someone else or blame someone for any problem or perceived problem. Its never the individuals fault, oh no! Its always attributable to someone or something else. In this case, its not the Millers fault, noooo, its guns! Its that darn 2nd Amendment again. Its the Bundy's fault (even though they asked them to leave their property), its far right extremists fault! My God, can anybody take responsibility for their own actions anymore?? Stop trying to blame everyone for the actions of the individual. This man was a meth user, he also had a prior criminal record, and a variety of other issues, but he was still a man capable of making his own choices, and he chose to do what he did, knowing there could be consequences. I'll bet you a brick of Gold if this couple were proud Obama supporters and their apartment was full of Che Guevara stickers and merchandise and posters of Hugo Chavez and other Marxist turds this article would never have been written nor would the story appear on the news! Why? It doesn't fit the liberal agenda or its carefully scripted narrative..

Carole L.
Carole L3 years ago

Lea H
”3) i deduced that the writer was using far right and tea party interchangeably. many do.”


"I'm not going to get into this distinction between the tea party and Republicans," Boehner added. "It's a distinction you're going to have a hard time finding."

Kathy N.
“Why do people always seem to think that the answer to any disagreement can only be solved by violence? What happened to respecting each others' right to have and express their own opinion? Where does all this intolerance come from?”

it was the last admin that perpetuated this; “yer fer us or agin us.” shoot first, invade, then occupy, attitude.