Will More Nonfiction Reading in School Lead to a Lack of Empathy?

Many schools in the United States are in the middle of adopting the Common Core, part of President Obama’s new education reform. This reform has hit English literature courses particularly hard because it shifts the focus from literature to nonfiction. While nonfiction texts that meet the standards can be read in any class, from science to history, and there is still a place for literature in the curriculum, English teachers are still being asked to teach more nonfiction than they are used to.

Why did the standards change reading requirements so drastically? According to the leading architect of the Common Core Standards Initiative and president of the College Board, David Coleman, “So many kids, often as many as 50 percent, graduate high school … demonstrably not ready for the demands of a first-year college course or job-training program.” The truth of the matter is that reading nonfiction goes a long way toward improving student test scores and, therefore, increases readiness for college and careers.

Of course, this seems like a great thing. Improving test scores while making sure kids are ready for their post-high school endeavors? Win-win. However, what happens to students when fiction is taken out of the curriculum? What happens to those books like “The Catcher in the Rye” or “To Kill a Mockingbird,” and how will the students be affected for not reading them?

Most often, books such as these are the ones that people pass on to their friends and family members, saying that these books changed their lives. Keith Oatley, professor emeritus in the department of human development and applied psychology at the University of Toronto, and Maja Djikic set out to prove how true the claim that a book changed someone’s life truly was. They collected participants and gave them all personality tests. Then, they gave some of the participants the short story “The Lady with the Little Dog” by Anton Chekhov and they gave the others a version of the story rewritten in a nonfiction style. Following that, they gave the participants the personality test again.

The results were remarkable. Each participant who read the fiction story experienced a slight change in his or her personality, and each participant changed in a unique way. According to Oatley, this is because fiction is a form of meditation that allows each individual to open his or her mind in a unique way:

Reading narrative fiction (and potentially narrative non-fiction such as memoirs as well) is like a form of meditation, Oatley says, because it opens you up to emptying your mind of real-life concerns in favour of focusing on a fictional world.

“You go sit somewhere quietly, or you go lie on a couch, or go to bed, you put aside your own concerns and now you take on the concerns of Anna Karenina or Emma Bovary, or whoever it happens to be. So you then start to experience what life was like from within a different mind.”

That experience, although guided by the story, is entirely individual, Oatley says, which is why it affects everyone differently. This kind of individual response to a book is something most readers have experienced at some point, whether by crying over certain circumstances or applying a character’s lesson to their own life.

As people are experiencing fiction in their own ways, they are practicing empathy. The fiction they read allows them to experience life as someone else, or in a different time and place, and allows them to be more empathetic in their real lives. As a teacher, I want my students to be productive members of society who are prepared for life after high school, but I also want them to be good citizens who will help someone in need. I want them to be able to think about their actions and how they affect the world around them and then make choices that benefit themselves, but also benefit the greater good. If we take fiction out of the curriculum, there is a danger that this will not happen. Teaching fiction is vital to creating well-rounded young adults, and is also necessary in practicing empathy.

Fortunately, the Common Core does still leave room for fiction, and many English teachers are using nonfiction articles that relate to the fiction they already teach in order to meet the increased requirement for nonfiction and to boost interest in the novels by connecting them to students’ lives. I just hope that fiction never gets taken out of the curriculum entirely. Something that drastic might have many consequences beyond just losing some good stories.

Related Stories:

Teaching in America: Exhausting or Exhilarating?

Curiosity and Care: The Core Necessity for Learning

Why Are the Presidential Hopefuls Ignoring Education?

Photo Credit: Ian Wilson


Duane B.
.4 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Christine Jones
Christine J5 years ago

It's all very well learning facts and figures and growing up to be a productive employee, but fiction offers us so much more than that. As a child, I was a voracious reader of everything I could get my hands on. We were not allowed to read at the dinner table (fair enough) and I was often caught surreptitiously reading the labels of the sauce bottles! I still read every day and really, without fiction, life would be so much poorer.

Elizabeth W.
Elizabeth W5 years ago

I hope that the fiction element of English studies isn't diminished too drastically. Fiction is an integral part of learning our language - would they decrease the study of poetry or Shakespeare as well? I think it would be better to select novels more carefully. For example, most of the novels I had to read in high school (I don't live in the U.S.A.) were disgusting - I honestly don't know what they were doing in the curriculum. That being said, the first novel I ever had to read for English was To Kill A Mockingbird, and it has been my favourite novel ever since. It made me even more aware of my thoughts and actions, even though I always had been quite aware of myself in that regard. It really changed me for the better, and I really hope books such as these will be kept in the system.

I'm not sure that I really agree with the whole 'empathy' idea, but I think fiction should say fairly prevalent within the system for educational purposes (the whole idea of school); afterall, how can the students be expected to gain a thorough understand of writing fiction (which helps with other writing styles, or so I personally have found) if they are not shown enough examples of good literature?

I think they've being a bit overdramatic in this particular situation, but I just wanted to say how important I think fiction is in the school system.

Dawn W.
Dawn W5 years ago

There already is a lack of empathy.How can it get any worse?
Their still keeping fiction,just less of it.Not really a problem that I can tell.

Lydia Price

A true story that had a profound impact upon my life is The Diary of Anne Frank. We are Jewish, of European descent and the Holocaust is the true nightmare of my people and many other peoples as well. This is a horrible tragedy that we must never forget. This precious child's diary tears at your heart and in my mind wins hands down over any other truth or fiction out there.

Garnet Jenny Fulton
Past Member 5 years ago

Never thought of it that way, I think just having a child read is a great accomplishment because it opens up the imagination and creative processes, so I don't know if this is true. I would like to think that empathy is taught mostly through our actions - what we see others doing and how they respond to situations not just through the written word.

Mary Lindsley
Mary Lindsley5 years ago

There is a place for all of literature. The problem is in getting children to read. If they read a comic book and it kept their interest...wonderful! We all need to escape reality sometimes.

a             y m.
g d c5 years ago


Tim C.
Tim C5 years ago


Ro H.
Ro H5 years ago

Read, read, read.