Your Unborn Baby’s Genetic Code: Do You Want To Know?

Scientists are now able to sequence almost the entire genome of a fetus using a blood sample from the mother and saliva from the father. This new non-invasive approach — in contrast to amniocentesis, which involves sampling fluid from the uterus and carries a slight risk of miscarriage — means that virtually the entire DNA of an 18-week-old fetus can be determined. Prenatal testing for a number of genetic disorders could be a real possibility very soon. Expecting parents could soon find themselves faced with some wrenching ethical decisions, should the tests reveal that their fetus has a genetic disorder.

New Study: “Noninvasive Whole-Genome Sequencing of a Human Fetus”

Genome scientists at the University of Washington used new high-speed DNA sequencing techniques along with statistical and computational modeling to create the test, which can determine a fetus’ genome with up to 98 percent accuracy. They drew on research from the 1990s that found that a pregnant woman’s blood plasma contains cell-free DNA from her fetus and that these fragments can be genetically analyzed. Indeed, there are already commercially available tests that rely on analysis of fetal DNA fragments to determine a fetus’ gender, paternity and whether it might have Down Syndrome.

The new test would allow for the detection of Mendelian disorders, which result from the mutation of a single gene and include†cystic fibrosis,†Tay-Sachs disease and†Marfan syndrome. Besides such inherited genetic disorders, the new test can potentially identify de novo or spontaneous mutations, which are responsible for the majority of genetic defects and which have been linked to disorders including schizophrenia and autism. De novo mutations are thought to account for about 10 percent of cases of mental retardation and learning disabilities.

The research, which was published in the Science Translational Medicine, could enable doctors to screen fetuses for some 3,500 genetic disorders.

Parents Could Face Wrenching Ethical Questions From Prenatal Testing Results

While analyzing one fetus’ DNA would currently cost about $20,000 to $50,000, researchers predict that, due to fast-moving developments in DNA sequencing, the test could be widely available in three to five years.

Some 85 percent of expecting parents who learn their fetus has Down Syndrome choose to abort. As the New York Times quotes Marcy Darnovsky, associate executive director of the Berkeley-based public interest group, the Center for Genetics and Society, the test could lead to scenarios in which people are able to decide “who deserves to be born” — the prospect of “designer babies,” of parents perhaps choosing to end a pregnancy because a fetus does not have certain desired traits. Could people even start requesting that potential partners undergo genetic testing at some point in the dating process?

What If There Were a Prenatal Genetic Test For Autism?

What parents decide to do with such information will be certainly highly personal. When I first heard about a prenatal test for autism possibly existing in the future, I thought back to the day in 1996 when my OB-GYN explained about testing for Down Syndrome. My immediate thought was that, “whatever” our baby might have or be, we would love him and care for him all the same.

But that might not be the right choice for all parents, for all mothers: Women and families must have the right to choose what is best and live with the results.

My son Charlie is on the moderate to severe end of the autism spectrum. He was diagnosed with autism back in July of 1999 shortly after his second birthday. I have always felt we and he were lucky to know so early, as we were then able, in very short order, to start him in intensive educational therapy and other treatments. None of these have “cured” him from autism and, after spending thousands of dollars and putting our careers on hold or pretty much changing our whole lives and moving around the country to find him the best possible school and after years of angst and arguing with school districts to provide him with the services he needs, Charlie has many, many challenges.†A previous generation would have probably institutionalized him at a young age as he little language, tests as mentally retarded, can have some really severe behaviors.

It is true. If Charlie were not with us, I would not have been up till 4am Thursday morning doing laundry because, with his minimal speech, Charlie could not tell me that his bed was wet and I did not discover that till 2am. There would not be a dent in my neighbor’s car after Charlie, in the throes of an anxiety attack on Tuesday morning with the end of the school year imminent, ran out the front door and right at the car, because it was in his path as he ran across the street.

But how could there not be a boy who has ridden bikes all over New Jersey with my husband? Who got us all to cheer when he could finally say his name clearly (he was around 7 years old)? Who shows how intelligent he is and how much he understands all without using any words? Who did his best to communicate, in his non-verbal way, that he felt really bad about the neighbor’s car and that he is trying his very best? Who we simply love more every day?

Every day with Charlie is not always so easy, but every day (even the toughest ones) is good because he is with us.

“Not Science Fiction Anymore”

As Jay Shendure, associate professor of genome sciences at the University of Washington and the supervisor of the research team, said, more detailed prenatal genetic testing is “not science fiction anymore.” Soon we will be able to know†quite a lot about an unborn child and at an earlier stage in his or her life. But what parent can lok into a crystal ball and know the whole course of what might happen to a child? A child might have all the athletic ability in the world but really prefer playing the violin rather than football.

Rather than fear what science has to tell us, we need to acknowledge that we can now know quite a lot more than we might like about a very young fetus and school ourselves to make the choices we will need — we need — to make.

Related Care2 Coverage

UN Calls For Investigation of Autism Schoolís Electric Shock Treatment

You Canít Bleach Autism Out of a Child

Parents Awarded $3 Million After Daughter Born With Down Syndrome


Photo by Daquella manera


Petra S.
Petra S1 years ago

So, less mental disorders between very rich?

Jane R.
Jane R3 years ago

This is extremely important information for parents that what to know. Tests that a person decides to have are a personal decision. It does not belong to another.

Dave C.
David C4 years ago

we didn't the testing available at the time.......this worries me that it is once again something "the haves" will have, but not the less needy/fortunate who might actually need it more.....

Darren Woolsey
Darren W4 years ago

Another question need to be, WHY do you want to know... what is the reason behind knowing... Humankind, every one of the 7 Billion population are unique and have potential.

Someone like Stephen Hawking, with Motor Neuron Disease, is a brilliant scientist and physicist, and he might not have been able to develop his art in the way he has, had he been physically capable and able.

This also demonstrates how the mind and senses can cope and function, sometimes to a degree that surpasses a physically normal person, without the usage of the body, which also demonstrates that the human being is a composition of parts, that can make up a greater whole, but that those parts seem able to function perfectly adequately, and sometimes brilliantly without being "connected" to each other.

Science and Scientists seem to be "tinkering" around the edges of this technology involving the genome and genetic code, almost as if, a child finds a toy, and plays with it, until it gets bored and looks around for something else with which to occupy its mind.

Valerie L.
Valerie L4 years ago

The more information the better so that people can make informed decisons

pam w.
pam w5 years ago

Shaking my head over those who say they'd never terminate a pregnancy, knowing they had a "special" child.

It's all well & good to say you value life and think people with Down syndrome are "sweet" and so on.

BUT--imagine YOURSELF paying to house someone who can't live on their own....and imagine the worry of leaving that child in the hands of "someone" who will be responsible after your death.

Medical costs for "special" people can be it fair to ANYONE to knowlingly continue such a pregnancy just because YOU want to have a baby?

Hayley C.
Hayley C5 years ago

I can see the advantages of knowing ahead of time about a disorder, but I would never have this done.

katarzyna phillips

surely you'd want to know if your child will have any health problems or disabilities? you can prepare better and have the coping strategies and support in place if it is born, than then finding out and going "oh crap! panic panic. now what do we do?" especially if either of you are a carrier of a potential disorder. however, it is also within the parents' best interests also to know they have a child they can afford to look after. if the child has difficulties, it could put a financial burden on the family, possibly causing it to split and then how would that child [and parents] feel? it what you as a human can deal with. could you-or let your partner give birth to a child, then find out is has difficulties and then have to decide to put it for adoption as you can't cope? not a nice situation either way.

Kathy Perez
Kathy Johnson5 years ago

no. who are we to decide which babies life is valuable and which isn't? It is a sad world. All babies deserve love, even if they aren't societies idea of the "perfect, ideal" child

Melissa Franklin
Melissa Franklin5 years ago

No. You should love your unborn baby no matter if they have any "disorders" or not. After all, YOU chose to have the SEX that produced that baby!!!!!!