Start A Petition

Oregon : Wolf Killing Legislation: Only as Last Resort

Animals  (tags: Wolf, Oregon, protection, environment, habitat, conservation, endangered, animalcruelty, animalrights )

- 2138 days ago -
The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission on Friday adopted provisions of a lawsuit settlement that will make Oregon the only state in the West where killing wolves that attack livestock is a last resort.


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


roxy H (350)
Sunday July 14, 2013, 8:07 pm
GRANTS PASS, Ore. — The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission on Friday adopted provisions of a lawsuit settlement that will make Oregon the only state in the West where killing wolves that attack livestock is a last resort.

The rules adopted by the commission amend Oregon’s Wolf Management Plan, along with statutory provisions enacted by the Legislature that will be signed by Gov. John Kitzhaber.

The rules require ranchers to show they have taken non-lethal steps, such as alarm boxes and low strings of fluttering plastic flags known as fladdery, to protect their herds before the state will send out a hunter to kill a wolf. There must also be hard evidence, such as GPS data showing a radio-collared wolf was in the area when a cow was killed, that wolves have attacked four times.

In return, ranchers get new rights to shoot wolves that they see attacking their herd, but only if those non-lethal protections are in place, and attacks have become chronic.

The settlement represents a new level of cooperation between conservation groups and ranchers, who have long fought over restoring wolves in the West, where they were wiped out by bounty hunters in the early part of the 20th century.

Ranchers downplayed the significance of the settlement.

“I don’t think it’s a whole lot different from the wolf plan already being implemented,” said Kate Teisl, executive director of the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association. “Now there’s just more documentation. Ranchers are out there doing all they can to keep their animals alive, including the non-lethal measures.”

But wolf advocates said it was that documentation of non-lethal steps that was groundbreaking.

Rob Klavins of Oregon Wild said the old plan talked about conservation of wolves being a priority, but it was so ambiguous that it was ineffective.

“It’s now up to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the livestock industry, and the conservation community to honor the agreements that we have made,” he said. “If we do so, I am optimistic we will continue to see conflicts between wolves and livestock continue to be rare, and the need to kill wolves even rarer still.”

Brett Brownscombe, natural resources adviser to the governor, said making the rules clear was important as Oregon’s wolf population continues to grow, and the Obama administration moves toward lifting federal protections for wolves in areas they have yet to repopulate.

Oregon Wild and other conservation groups had sued the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, claiming that a kill order on the Imnaha pack, the first to establish in Oregon as well as the first to attack livestock, threatened to wipe out the pack. Conservation groups claimed the actions violated the Oregon Endangered Species Act, which still protects wolves in the eastern two thirds of the state, where federal protections have been lifted.

The Imnaha pack only has one more strike against it before a kill order can be imposed, but so far, it has not been linked to an attack.

The Oregon Court of Appeals barred the state from killing wolves for more than a year before the settlement was reached between conservation groups, the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association, and the governor’s office. During that time, the number of wolves in Oregon went up, while the lethal attacks on livestock went down. In Idaho, where the Oregon packs had migrated from, the numbers of lethal livestock attacks went up, along with the numbers of wolves killed, primarily by trophy hunters and trappers.

John C (75)
Sunday July 14, 2013, 8:28 pm
It is one thing to love and admire. It is another to have them in your backyard. I would never make their lives any more difficult than it already is. A little grace is in order from both perspectives.
These are relentless animals. Until you have them on your trail I don't think you can appreciate irony.The opposite is also true.

roxy H (350)
Sunday July 14, 2013, 8:37 pm
I have been around wolves for more then 20 years of my life, Thanks for the support

John C (75)
Sunday July 14, 2013, 8:42 pm
You have my respect. I track by profession. My hobby as a mechanic makes my living.

roxy H (350)
Sunday July 14, 2013, 8:46 pm
good luck to you, and nothing easy for either of us, I understand

Danuta W (1251)
Monday July 15, 2013, 4:34 am

Frances Darcy (92)
Tuesday July 16, 2013, 1:08 am

Aud nordby (736)
Tuesday July 16, 2013, 1:16 am

Leslene Dunn (84)
Tuesday July 16, 2013, 1:27 am
Noted and signed - Roxy, you are so lucky to have been part of the pack for all these years - it's the life I would love to have lived, in the wild with them and I am so envious. They are so beautiful. We need to do so much more to try and protect them for vile savage plagues such as these sub humans.

paula eaton (30)
Tuesday July 16, 2013, 1:55 am
Thank you Roxy.

Veronique L (209)
Tuesday July 16, 2013, 2:58 am
Noted thank you

Past Member (0)
Tuesday July 16, 2013, 4:35 am
noted 16/7,thank you
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Animals

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.