Start A Petition

TAKE ACTION NOW! Tell President Obama: Amb. Susan Rice's Tar Sands Investments Are a Big Problem!

Environment  (tags: news, media, obama, politics, ENVIRONMENT, SUSAN RICE, Susan Rice, environment, government, corruption, abuse, environment, humans, government, green )

- 2144 days ago -
While Susan Rice is a highly accomplished professional with considerable foreign policy experience, her masssive financial holdings in tar sands extraction in Canada...expose her blatant disregard for protection of the environment or the need to shift ou


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Gysele van Santen (213)
Monday December 3, 2012, 7:17 pm

Jason S (50)
Monday December 3, 2012, 7:18 pm
signed, thanks

Judy C (91)
Monday December 3, 2012, 7:44 pm
Signed. Thanks, Cal.

John B (185)
Monday December 3, 2012, 8:23 pm
Thanks Cal. Action taken. Noted.

Arild Gone for now (174)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:41 am
Signed,TY Cal.

Michela M (3964)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:54 am

Vicynthia Tjahjadi (57)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:27 am
Signed. Thanks.

Cynthia Davis (340)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:33 am
Signed TY Cal

Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:36 am
Took awhile to load, but signed.

Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:53 am

Susanne R (236)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 6:27 am
I have nothing against Susan Rice. She appears to be a very intelligent and highly disciplined woman. However, her investment in the tar sands project could create a conflict of interest. It certainly shows a lack of environmental concern.

Signed and noted!

Sara Williams (8)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 7:23 am
Her involvement definitely makes her biased in this situation. How could it not? Gladly signed.

Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 7:50 am
Signed. She's clearly unsuitable for the job.

Daniel Partlow (179)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 8:28 am
S&N. This does indeed send a bad message!

Mike H (252)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 10:44 am
Signed. She is very wealthy and obviously doesn't care how she makes money. Typical unethical politician.

Angelika R (143)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 11:34 am
dear Susan R. -have you READ the petition? I preiously shared your view and believed that this "conflict of interest" could be solved if she got rid of her investments, now Ii know better. Thanks Cal and thx Earl D James!

"This is not a conflict of interest that can be eliminated if Susan Rice sells her stock in these industries. It's too late to erase the fact that Susan Rice's investments over many years if not decades have been in some of the most polluting and climate-damaging industries in the world.

That sends a very negative message to the world, especially if she were to become Secretary of State. That negative message would be: "While we give lip service to combating climate change and investing in renewable, clean energy production, we actually are supporting and profiting from dirty fossil fuels."

This is no message for the US Secretary of State to be sending to the world.

Mr. President, we petition you to nominate a candidate for Secretary of State that is not burdened by such an environmentally negative history. Climate change is rapidly becoming the number one global security issue our world faces. It is important for our nation's spokespersons to walk the talk."

Angelika R (143)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 11:36 am
I meant of course our dear friend SUSANNE R., not "Susan", sorry. Of course I also signed this petition and expect more to come.

Jamie Clemons (282)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 12:51 pm
Well I don't want to tell you that I told you so, but I did. I told you Obama would not turn over another leaf after he got re-elected he would be the same old two faced jackel he was the first 4 years. Talks like he is all progressive then wants to put people like this and Rice in his cabinet. He is nothing but a blue dog democrat.

Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:04 pm
Thank you Cal for this. Signed.

DORIS L (61)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:15 pm

Henrik Thorsen (31)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:16 pm

Joanne Dixon (38)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:18 pm
Jamie, he also told us to "make him" do the right things. To my mind this petition is in that category. There is a lot of pressure on him in his position and he does need for some of that pressure to be from us and in the right direction. If course if we just sit around on our - ahem, laurels we will be part of the problem.

I do believe Ms. Rice is otherwise highly qualified and my major feeling on learning this was one of disappointment. But then I am also disappointed that this petition is on, since they have gone over to the dark side. What about, MoveOn, Credo, avaaz, WhiteHouse, or even Care2? I suppose WhiteHouse should not be used unless Ms. Rice is actually nominated, which, as of an hour ago, she had not been.

Solitary Eagle (324)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:20 pm

Sergio P (65)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:23 pm

Ann P (17)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:24 pm
Noted and signed. L♥ve ☮ Peace.

Lisa N (207)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 1:25 pm
Thank you for signing the petition "President Obama: Amb. Susan Rice's Tar Sands Investments are a Big Problem!"

Ellen Kent (0)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 2:26 pm

janet f (29)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 2:44 pm
Why is this administration backing her? There is a serious lack of good judgement if anyone thinks she should be Secretary of State. Looks like the next four years will not be any better for the environment or animals than the last four.

Kathlene Lentz (30)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:01 pm

Charlene Rush (79)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:04 pm
Her investments MUST be taken into consideration.
These investments, also, do not endear me to her.
While, I usually, support President Obama's choices, which he hasn't yet made in this case, I would not stand behind Ms. Rice, if he selects her for this position.

GREED most always, wins out.

Alison A (244)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:08 pm
Signed and noted, thanks Cal.

Kathleen R (138)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:08 pm
signed & noted

Lois Jordan (63)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:35 pm
Gladly signed & noted. Much thanks for posting, Cal.

Robert Tomlinson (62)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 3:44 pm
Signed & Noted!

Theodore Shayne (56)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:24 pm
Posted & signed

Carrie B (306)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:31 pm
Thanks Cal. Signed and noted.

Stan B (123)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:32 pm
Susan Rice's investments aren't the main problem. She is.

Aletta Kraan (146)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 4:44 pm
Signed , thanks !

Sonny Honrado (5)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 5:16 pm

Vicky P (476)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 5:54 pm
noted and signed

Helen Porter (39)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 6:10 pm
noted and signed

Angelika R (143)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 6:21 pm
" gone over to the dark side"?? Huh? Can anyone tell me more on that, examples, evidence?

Fran F (116)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 6:58 pm
Commented and signed. Thanks, Cal.

Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 7:23 pm
Well, she is a "moderate" eh hem. Wouldn't be great if republicans could change their minds with new info?

roxy H (350)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 10:38 pm
I have plenty of the links about changing thier format Angelikanomail Roll ... I refuse to sign on , but i broke my promise for this one...ugh ... I think Ms Susan MUST Drop these damn pipeline or Obama must walk away from her..simple as that. no exceptions! ... let me pull up some links for you about change before i post anymore of my wolf news..I have so much business i get bogged down and distracted with so much if i don't act immediately i forget where i sec i brb

Nimue Michelle Pendragon Gaze (339)
Tuesday December 4, 2012, 11:15 pm

Victoria Pohrebna (279)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 12:30 am

Anna M (18)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 5:18 am
I think no human can be neutral when their own bottom line is at stake.

Anyone that invests in dirty fuel is no friend to the public's best interests

Kristina J (10)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 5:41 am
Would have signed, but no for me. Why don't we have our own petition????

Andrea Nemec (213)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 5:54 am
Noted and signed! Thanks!

Unnikrishnan Sasidharan (44)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 7:39 am

David C (108)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 7:46 am

Angelika R (143)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 8:03 am
Susanne, thx for not feeling "offended" and I applaud your decision! We all should remember the same scenario from last year with Hillary, as mentioned above.
And many thanks to Roxy as well for that info, will look into the links. It did make me mad when changed the format but I had no further knowledge.
Kristina J.-good question, guess someone will have to create it. And look for further petitions from the major environmental and progressive organisations on the issue as they come rolling in.

Bartlomiej T (296)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 8:56 am
Signed & noted. Thank you Cal

Ingo S (8)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 9:43 am

Past Member (0)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 9:54 am
Thanks for sharing.

Wim Zunnebeld (144)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 2:47 pm

Wim Zunnebeld (144)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 2:47 pm

Talya H (10)
Wednesday December 5, 2012, 11:06 pm

michael sullivan (1022)
Monday December 10, 2012, 4:53 pm
noted and signed -- a definite conflict of interests here!

Dianne D (490)
Thursday December 27, 2012, 7:08 pm
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Environment

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.