Start A Petition

Video: Protestors Stand Their Ground in Battle Over Indian Mound

Society & Culture  (tags: Native Americans, burial site, destruction, progress )

- 3557 days ago -
Oxford, Ala. - The battle over a Native American Indian mound in Oxford has garnered national - even international attention. The city is tearing down the historic site to help build a new retail development. The dirt work at the mound has created


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Scarlett P (126)
Friday August 21, 2009, 8:05 am
Thank you Terry for this ariticle... I leave outside of about 13 miles from Oxford and I'm one of those people aware of what Oxford's mayor, Leon Smith is doing to destroy significant prehistory sites.

Since so much destruction already has been done to this mound, I wonder if there is not a larger issue to which Oxford folks should be paying attention. Is no one looking at the potentially illegal, if not certainly unethical, relationship between the mayor, his friends and campaign donors, and the the quasi-governmental development agency that DOES NOT HAVE TO TAKE COMPETITIVE BIDS. There is a federal investigation going on involving a recent North Carolina governor for the same sort of behavior. If it is illegal under federal law in North Carolina, why is it not in Alabama? Dan Whisenut has detailed some of those relationships in a few of his stories, and (to use one of the mayor's own images) where there is that much smoke I assume there is a lot more fire. Is no one else paying attention????

And by the way, those interested in this mound might like to read a recent Salon article about mounds in another major Mississippian culture archaic mega-settlement, Cahokia. It explains the uncredited sophistication of these mound-based settlements, which predated what we think of prairie- and woodlands-based Native American life. Read it here:

Scarlett P (126)
Friday August 21, 2009, 8:11 am
The Anniston Star Newspaper

Mound controversy spans the Web: American Indian site in Oxford now on Facebook, Twitter

OXFORD The controversy over the city's mysterious American Indian mound is officially global. But city leaders are skeptical of the mound's newfound Internet fame.

The Indian mound, which could be 1,000 years old or older, sits atop a hill behind the Oxford Exchange. Some preservation officials are worried it could contain human remains or burial artifacts. Until recently the city has planned to demolish the hill for fill dirt for a nearby Sam's Club. But work has stopped.

City officials have changed their story about plans for the mound. City Project Manger Fred Denney initially said it would be fill dirt. Now he says he never said it or that he misspoke. Denney's original statements are backed up by two different public documents, including a University of Alabama report commissioned by the city.

Carolyn Chambliss, who says she lives in Tuscany, Italy, founded a Facebook group and cause related to the issue. Facebook is a social networking site connecting friends and acquaintances based on numerous affiliations. The Facebook group is called, "Stop Sacred Burial Mounds from becoming a Sam's Club"; the cause, "Save Sacred Mounds from Destruction/ Boycott Sam's Club."

There are more than 7,000 members between the two groups, formed about one month ago, and the protest is also active on Twitter, another social networking site where people communicate by posting short messages.

Chambliss hopes these "virtual protests" will lead to "a real paradigm shift in Americans' perception of Native Americans." She's also discussed raising money for the preservation of the mound, which she would put into a trust.

"We did a Twitter blast," Chambliss said. "All through the world we blasted Sam's Club and we got immediate results and people started talking about it in Oxford because of this virtual protest."

She said there are several people in the area working with her. Jacksonville resident Laurie Charnigo said she uses the group to stay informed about the mound and other issues that concern American Indians.

"People have been writing letters," she said. "There are thousands of people not in this community writing letters to different organizations and associations and the mayor's office." She said the group is also concerned about other potential historic sites, like the proposed location for Oxford's sports complex, which will include an area known as Davis Farm. Harry Holstein, Jacksonville State University professor of archaeology and anthropology, said the people who constructed the mound likely lived on that site.

Sam's Club, which is owned by Wal-Mart, has responded to the controversy by saying no artifacts from the mound would go into its site. That's true, but that was never at issue. The issue was what would happen to the dirt, something Sam's does not control. The city, through its Commercial Development Authority, owns the hill.

The misunderstanding about who is responsible for the mound bothers Councilman Steven Waits.

"They're speaking about boycotting Sam's," Waits said. "It's really unrelated to Sam's. The issue is about the mound and preserving the mound. They're not utilizing dirt from that mound for the Sam's club."

Councilwoman June Land Reaves had similar concerns and said the story has been an embarrassment to her.

"It's my understanding right now that no dirt is being taken from the mound," she said. "It's being brought from somewhere else, but the damage has been done to a point."

Council president Chris Spurlin and Councilman Phil Gardner were dismissive of Chambliss' efforts, saying there's a possibility most of the members of the group and cause are not who they say they are. Mayor Leon Smith declined to comment for this story.

Can an Internet movement with members who are not from the area have an impact on a local issue? One researcher says it can, if it's done correctly.

Sam Ford is a graduate of the Comparative Media Studies program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and helped launch a group called the Convergence Culture Consortium. In short, it researches the effectiveness of social networking sites like Facebook.

"My answer would be these groups absolutely do have the ability to influence, to change outcomes," he said. He called Facebook another avenue for grassroots movements. He noted social networking sites were useful for people trying to communicate in the aftermath of the contentious Iranian elections. He added these groups are not a "silver bullet" to raising awareness or solving problems. With the ease of communications also comes the ease of signing onto a group or cause.

"I think it's interesting the international implications of this particular movement," Ford said. "Here's a local issue with ties into an audience that's geographically dispersed."

Chambliss said the Oxford mound issue fascinates her and other members because of its symbolic importance.

"For me, with Native American heritage, I'm emotionally linked to it," she said. "I feel in a way our ancestors are calling out to us for this big injustice. I feel I've been called across the ocean in Italy."

Rhonda Maness (580)
Friday August 21, 2009, 12:34 pm
Thanks Terry

. (0)
Saturday August 22, 2009, 8:13 am
I wish I could be there to join them and protest...
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.