Start A Petition

Attorney General Would Refuse to Enforce Contempt


US Politics & Gov't  (tags: MUKASEY, traitor, constitution, illegal, contempt, subpoena, miers, bolton, impeach, wexler, kucinich, corruption, iraq, troops, bush, congress, cheney )

Ratty
- 4115 days ago - news2note.4t.com
One thing is abundantly clear: If Congress' right to require testimony is undermined, then our country's leaders - Democrat, Republican, or Independent - will be immune from accountability.



   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Ratty R (160)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 3:47 pm

Impeachment is necessary.

1) http://wexlerwantshearings.com


2) http://www.usalone.com/


3) http://www.impeachbush.org


4) http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/


5) http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=6


6) http://www.congress.org


7) http://senate.gov/
  

8) freewayblogger.com


9)
http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.HTML?gpp=5103&PST=744610
 

Ratty R (160)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 3:49 pm

Last link above doesn't work, just copy and paste this please:

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=5103&pst=744610

 

. (0)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 4:44 pm
can not cut and paste he probably has his hands in the gas scandal i say move on we don't need there gas we can use electric cars
 

Phyllis P (232)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 7:05 pm
these people are down right scary..
 

Tim Redfern (581)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 7:43 pm
Maybe it's time to impeach Mukasey, too?
Thanks, Ratty, and
thanks for the link to
wexlerwantshearings.com

noted.
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 9:06 pm
Noted & signed Petition
 

Mara G (411)
Saturday February 9, 2008, 11:27 pm
YES...they all need to go. They were crooks hired by crooks....what can we expect but more of the same favoritism. They must all get out!!
 

Chris Nielsen (75)
Sunday February 10, 2008, 7:31 pm
It looking more like there needs to be a National Constitutional Convention. Short of having another civil war, the safest way to remove those who wish to extinguish all human life is a popular convention to undo all the damage that has been done.
 

Past Member (0)
Sunday February 10, 2008, 7:46 pm
I'm with Chris on this one. Thanks for the article. (Already on the 'wexlerwantshearings' mailing list.)
 

Morgana Rhys (10)
Sunday February 10, 2008, 9:05 pm
Anyone with half a lick of common sense should have known that Bush would never nominate someone who would enforce, let alone respect the law. Mukasey has now betrayed his Oath of Office, and the Rule of Law enough times that We the People could file a Breach of Contract suit.
Congress was responsible for giving this con man a pass, time to IMPEACH him and the whole rotten lot! They owe us that much.
 

Eva Cox (377)
Sunday February 10, 2008, 10:31 pm
Ditto, Ratty, and thanks a BUNCH. Yes, throw all of them out by impeachment. Now that McCain's the presidential candidate for the Republicans, he seems to think that he can take the power that George Bush has stolen from the other two branches of government and put ALL OF US in camps, which is not a paranoid notion, but a reality, if he becomes president, and it is rumored that Cheney will still be calling the shots in a MCCAIN ADMINISTRATION, if we are so unfortunate to have another election stolen and given to the Republicans. I say IMPEACH, IMPEACH, IMPEACH, and impeach the Attorney General along with them, if THAT'S WHAT IT TAKES; THEN LET'S DO IT.
 

Michael Sandstrom (306)
Tuesday February 12, 2008, 12:01 am
This MAN is also GUILTY! He SWORE to uphold thee Constitution!!! and he is NOT!
"He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither". Benjamin Franklin
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, --

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security -- Such has been the patient sufferance of these STATES; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
-- The history of the present King of the United States is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

This "war" started on the "inside" or by a few people from another country. I think it was an inside job so that Bush would get the backing he needed to go to war. However, after thinking about it, IF we were attacked by lets say 100 people from ANY country, does that mean that was a military attack from that country?? If 100 Americans went and attacked lets say China or Britain or Germany, does that mean that our Country has attacked them?? Of course not! That is one of the MOST STUPIDEST things I have ever heard of!! after I thought and studied about it for awhile. So, a few ass h0les from another country attack U.S. Does that mean that that country has attacked us?? Of course NOT! "They" are saying 1 man caused this and we have attacked 2 countries!!! Do I see something wrong in this picture? Do you understand what I am saying? Just think about it. "We" attacked 2 countries because of maybe 50 people?? And they did not use their military to attack us? The day I see soggy wet camels running down main street with 50 cal machine guns and/or cannons attached to them shooting and blowing things up, I might say that we have been attacked from another country. Still sounds like an inside job to me! Something smells, and it ain't pretty!!!
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't





 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.