Start A Petition

The Sugar Makes the Poison Taste Sweet -- William Rivers Pitt

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: abuse, americans, congress, democrats, dishonesty, economy, ethics, freedoms, government, healthcare, media, military, obama, SupremeCourt, troops, usa )

- 1937 days ago -
Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX) stormed out of the chamber before the speech was finished. Rep. Randy Weber (R-Also TX) sent out a Tweet calling Mr. Obama the "Kommandant-In-Chef" before the speech even began.


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Thursday January 30, 2014, 6:47 pm
Photo: President Barack Obama reviews his speech one last time while waiting in a room at the U.S. Capitol prior to delivering the State of the Union address in the House Chamber in Washington, DC, January 28, 2014. (Photo: Pete Souza / White House)

The President of the United States gave the annual State of the Union address on Tuesday night, and if you ask the right people, they'll tell you it was well and truly a barn-burner. President Obama dropped so many left-leaning, frown-inducing lines on the Republicans arrayed before him that Speaker Boehner, visible over the president's shoulder, changed hues from his standard orange to alarming red to call-the-paramedics purple on several notable occasions.

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX) stormed out of the chamber before the speech was finished. Rep. Randy Weber (R-Also TX) sent out a Tweet calling Mr. Obama the "Kommandant-In-Chef" before the speech even began. After the speech was over, no less than four Republican members of Congress - plus Ron Paul, who threw his two bent cents in for good measure - rose up to offer rebuttals, each of which went in their own merrily deranged direction, serving to underscore the shattered state of today's GOP. It was the Sybil Syndrome on network television, with neckties and Jesus thrown in to boot.

If you're not a fan of the Republicans in Congress, which you probably aren't according to all available polling data, it sounds like Tuesday was a pretty great night. If you deal with politics the way those little skimmer summer bugs deal with the surface of your favorite lake, it was. The president talked about income inequality, job creation, environmental protection, education, women's rights, voting rights, health care, and the warfare industry. Mr. Obama hit all the g-spots, and made it sound like he was just the guy to get it all done.

But then, if you're smart, you read the damned speech in detail...and if you did, like as not you have some serious questions to ask.

Questions, for example, like why Mr. Obama spent a good portion of his speech sounding for all the world like an Occupy Wall Street protester before turning on a dime to bend his knee to the failed religion of free-market economics. He did not say the words "Trans-Pacific Partnership." He did, however, say this: "Over the past five years, my administration has made more loans to small business owners than any other. And when ninety-eight percent of our exporters are small businesses, new trade partnerships with Europe and the Asia-Pacific will help them create more jobs."

Moles burrowed deep underground know by now that he wants that trade deal, and wants Congress to give him fast-track authority to get it done as soon as possible, despite the fact that the whole thing has been negotiated in secret, and will be, if ratified, caustic to American jobs in general, labor rights, environmental protections and human rights across the board. The Trans-Pacific Partnership, like its smaller cousin NAFTA, will not "create more jobs" as the president said Tuesday night, but will suck jobs out of the country and send them flying overseas. Again.

And then there is the question of why the president sounded like a Greenpeace activist when discussing environmental protections, before turning on a dime once again to promote a gas-mining practice called "fracking" that has already done lasting pollutive damage to communities all across the country. There are places in America, right this very minute, where you can light the tap water on fire because of the residue left over by this practice. A number of other countries have banned the process outright, but on Tuesday night, the president of the United States was hats-over-the-windmill thrilled by the prospect of spreading fracking far and wide. "In a fact sheet accompanying the speech," noted The Hill on Wednesday morning, "the White House called on Congress to establish 'sustainable shale gas growth zones.'"

Fracking is not sustainable. I guess that didn't make it into the notes for the speech. Can't imagine why.

And as we're on the subject of the environment, there's this state on the Eastern seaboard called West Virginia that Mr. Obama is president of along with the other 49. A company called Freedom Industries dumped poison into the water supply - two separate and distinct poisons, as it turns out - and left 300,000 people, their businesses, their schools, their hospitals, their retirement homes, without water to drink or bathe in or cook with for days and days and days.

According to Industry Specialists, the water is safe to drink now...but here's the funny part: the poison(s) that got dumped into the water supply have a funny way of breaking down into formaldehyde after a time, which they now have, and so all those West Virginians who had to avoid drinking the water are now drinking and cooking with and showering in - read "ingesting and breathing in" - a known carcinogen, and no one seems to be dealing with it. The president made no mention of that state, those citizens, or the industry that poisoned the water in the first place. If there is right now a better example of why we need stricter environmental regulations to protect the American people from these kinds of incidents, I'm not aware of it...and the president gave it a miss.

So three cheers to the wonderful rhetoric Mr. Obama devoted to the environment in his speech on Tuesday night. So long as you ignore the hazards of fracking, and ignore entirely the state of West Virginia (mission accomplished, Mr. President), he sounded for all the world like a true green hero. And since he also didn't mention the Keystone XL pipeline, we all get to wait to find out if he's going to green-light a fragile tube that will transport the dirtiest oil available on Earth across America's breadbasket and over our most vital water aquifer.

And then...and then, there was Cory Remsburg, the last invited guest Mr. Obama made note of. Remsburg, an Army Ranger, was injured by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan during his tenth deployment.

His tenth deployment.

His tenth deployment.

Cory Remsburg rose up before that parliament of whores, disfigured, maimed for life, and was duly recognized for his service and devotion to country. He received a deafening ovation from a room filled with the worst people in the country, many of whom voted over and over again to send him back to war ten times over, who cheered so loudly to cover over their shame...including the president himself, whose Afghanistan "surge" played its own part in putting Cory Remsburg in the path of the bomb that left him barely able to stand, blind in one eye, and forever damaged.

The President of the United States made no mention of the insanity of any soldier having to endure ten deployments, made no mention of the concept of actions and consequences, even as he stood before the loudest microphone on the planet. Perhaps he and his people thought the face of Cory Remsburg said it for him, and if so, that is another sorry example of the eleventy-dimension chess being played by an administration which is trying to run a country that only knows, politically, how to play checkers.

There are times when real leaders have to say things out loud into microphones, even when those things are so obvious that they bleed on the pavement. What happened to Cory Remsburg was wrong. It was, in fact, a crime, a long act of profiteering that has fed tens of thousands of men and women like him into the meat grinder, to be spat out into a VA system that is utterly overwhelmed and paralyzed before the avalanche of bodies it is tasked to help.

Instead, Mr. Obama said this: "My fellow Americans, men and women like Cory remind us that America has never come easy. Our freedom, our democracy, has never been easy. Sometimes we stumble; we make mistakes; we get frustrated or discouraged. But for more than two hundred years, we have put those things aside and placed our collective shoulder to the wheel of progress..."

We have put those things aside? Cory Remsburg, and the tens of thousands of soldiers who share his damage, cannot put those things aside. Mr. Obama turned that soldier's plight into a pep rally for the country that fed him to the bomb that almost killed him. "Sometimes we stumble; we make mistakes" was the only apology that ravaged Ranger got from his Commander in Chief. He deserved far more than that, as do all the men and women not lucky enough to get applause from Congress on television.

It is easy peasy for politicians to talk about putting difficult issues "aside," out of mind, away. That's the bread and butter of the Teflon not-my-problem political hack. Leaders, real leaders, address those difficult issues head-on. They challenge we the people to take them head-on, as well, and that is how we heal and rise and move on. That did not happen on Tuesday night. Again.

If you ask the right people, they'll tell you it was a great speech.

Ask me, and I'll tell you I saw a man talk like an Occupy protester while promoting the same tired, failed economic principles that spawned our yawning inequality in the first place. I saw a man talk like a Greenpeace activist while promoting or ignoring the dirtiest fuel industries in the business. I saw a man honor a ten-times-deployed wounded veteran with an "Oops." I saw a man talking very eloquently out of both sides of his mouth, again, and it made me sick in my soul.

"Between the idea and the reality," said a poet, "falls the Shadow."

It's the sugar that makes the poison taste sweet.

By: William Rivers Pitt | Op-Ed | Truth Out |

William Rivers Pitt is Truthout's senior editor and lead columnist. He is also a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of three books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know," "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence" and "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation." He lives and works in New Hampshire.

Kit B (276)
Thursday January 30, 2014, 6:51 pm

A bit of self disclosure, I read this a day ago, and have been in lengthy discussions since. Though many comments were thoughtful and respectful; this is the Internet and there were more than a few obnoxious comments. I ask that you read before jumping to conclusions about the content. Anyone is free to disagree, but I ask that disagreement be centered on the topic.

Arielle S (313)
Thursday January 30, 2014, 7:11 pm
As always, Pitt gives us an eloquent piece. I tend to both agree and disagree....seldom can any one person please everyone whether that person is an excellent writer or the president of the United States...

Kit B (276)
Thursday January 30, 2014, 7:41 pm

Very true, Arielle. I was pleased and heavily disappointed by the speech. Fortunately I don't pay much attention the SOTU show, but I do watch each one, no matter who is in the White House.

Robert B (55)
Friday January 31, 2014, 10:04 am
Here's the thing, IF our PRESIDENT had said everything liberals wanted to hear, the speech would have been a failure. The media would have overblown commentary and the the right would have done nothing but bitch. IF he would have said everything the conservatives wanted to hear, they would have bitched anyway and accused him of some trickery. Over all it was the best he could do with what LITTLE help he was getting from Congress. He's unfortunately on his own because BOTH sides want unrealistic goals. The right WILL NOT help this country by working with Obama. because basically, deep down they are bigots. The liberals expect Obama to be a ONE MAN MIRACLE WORKER, he's not. The Liberals need to SERIOUSLY FIGHT BACK and FULLY BACK OUR PRESIDENT. The Brown shirt teabaggers have to be defeated for ANY thing to work. They are a cancer in our Democracy. We can't afford to let this cancer spread.

. (0)
Friday January 31, 2014, 10:32 am
The only thing sugar is good for is powering one of those new fangled cell batteries.

Lucas Kolasa (9)
Friday January 31, 2014, 11:09 am
If we supply more than half of our own oil now, and we are almost energy independent, than why aren't gas prices back down to a dollar a gallon?

Kamia T (89)
Friday January 31, 2014, 11:10 am
Our country is sooo in trouble, because we're not producing statesmen any more. We need to find people willing to do what the founding fathers did, risk all, to stand up for what's right -- whether or not it's politically correct. You can't drive up one street at the same time you drive down another. That's the problem in Congress today, and why so little gets done. So sad.

JL A (281)
Friday January 31, 2014, 11:28 am
I read the text of the speech besides listening and saw the same subtleties he noted--that are efforts inconsistent with the other goals he spent more time on; thus I'm glad Reid is showing backbone related to the TPP fast track authority. I agree it wasn't realistic for any of us to hear everything we wanted to hear--but I hope things do happen to change the future for our military survivors with desire to ween some from the power of the contractors who feed at the public trough.

Birgit W (160)
Friday January 31, 2014, 1:59 pm
Kamia T. says it all. Thanks for sharing Kit.

Angela Reardon (0)
Friday January 31, 2014, 2:37 pm
I found the article to be heartfelt & personally it hit the nail on the head in terms of our country's uncanny ability to say...skim the sweet stuff off the top of an issue and leave the rest behind. As American citizens, we deserve better. Why we don't demand more is always baffling. There's a complete sense of complacency--and if not complacency, then defeatism, and if not that--we are too busy running the American rat-race of a "dream" to stand up for our rights. The rights to clean air, clean water, clean/affordable HEALTHY food, doctor's who care about preventing illness, affordable education with job placement assistance, and affordable housing. We need to start caring about our future as a country--if we want a future as a country it needs to start with us. We need something to believe in, otherwise we won't want to fight.

Lois Jordan (63)
Friday January 31, 2014, 3:04 pm
Noted. Thanks, Kit. Since I am cynical to begin with, I felt pretty much the same way as Mr. Pitt as I listened to the speech, so I loved the article. Although I'd hoped that Obama would be a progressive leader when becoming president, when I learned of all the conservatives surrounding him, and then noticed how his pre-election "promises" became diluted, my hopes sunk. I watched Progressives leave his staff, as Rahm Emmanuel stayed on. So, the speech made me wonder who has Obama's ear now, and what direction we're really heading in.

Sheila D (28)
Friday January 31, 2014, 3:14 pm
William Rivers Pitt makes valid points. I listened to the SOTU and thought most of it sounded very positive. After reading this post, I tend to think that's what our President wanted; a positive SOTU address. However, I agree that Cory Remsburg should NEVER have had to endure 10 deployments, the TPP is NOT good for the country, and W. Virginia should have been mentioned, if only as a cautionary point. Fossil fuels of any kind should not be our main source of energy, but we need educated, innovative people to find more ways and means to make that happen.
Thanks for the article, Kit.

Kit B (276)
Friday January 31, 2014, 3:31 pm

Will does have a way with words. What many of us were thinking or had rumbling around in our mind, he captured with deliciously accurate and sensitive words. I as soaring when I heard the words, "the debate is over, climate change is real" and I hit the ground hard when next he spoke of Oil, gas and blah, blah, blah!

You just can not have both.

. (0)
Friday January 31, 2014, 4:48 pm
Great article, Kit. Thanks for sharing.

Sheri Schongold (7)
Friday January 31, 2014, 4:51 pm
I didn't listen to the SOU speech, but then I never do. To my knowledge I haven't heard anything of value from the last bunch, only another bunch of lies. It is spoken of the things that matter to him only on the positive side, he never addresses the negatives here. All the food he keeps exporting should be kept here, we need it as well as everyone else. I am tired of other nations demanding and getting while the USA, who needs as much as anyone else, gives and gives and depletes our resources so that all our enemies are kept fed and happy. PS, they still hate us no matter what we send them.

Bryan S (105)
Friday January 31, 2014, 8:06 pm
I didn't hear the SOTU speech but agree with the article. And considering massive corporate backing is 100% necessary to become president, none of it should be a suprise. Remember, Obama had the most billions in Wall St. campaign funds in '08.

The Repubs embrace the very worst policies and ideas, but i've also heard it said that the Dems are the more effective of the two evils in that they make progressives feel more complacent. I can't disagree with that. If Bush was in office we'd probably be hearing much more about "Bush's evil TPP", "Bush's toxic fracking and XL pipeline", and Bush's immoral use of drones.

Bryan S (105)
Friday January 31, 2014, 8:21 pm
Oh and i hope everyone listens to Elizabeth Warren's speech that is linked to if you go to the Truthout site that Kit links to. It's really good, and you know she damn well means it!

Mike Pattison (6)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 1:27 am
Thanks for sharing

Mike Pattison (6)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 1:27 am
Thanks for sharing

Panchali Yapa (26)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 1:46 am
Thank you :)

Angelika R (143)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 6:47 am
Of course i sacrifyced my night sleep for that again and payed close attention to each word and picture.(always wanted to ask you guys what is it with Boehner's dentures? or is it sticking chewing gum in all the wrong places??)
As a European listener I probably had a bit of a different perception than most of you but, i can assure you that i had to hold myself back a few times to not awaken my neighbors.
Thx Will, and Kit!

Angelika R (143)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 6:51 am
Oh, forgot to mention that, all fired up from the prez' speech, I even tolerated to also let the words of that "lady in red" as the Great Offensive Put-to-sleep-contribution do exactly that!

Angelika R (143)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 6:53 am
i remember that my last thoughts before getting rescued by dreams were, that I felt sorry for all the C2 friends here from Washington state.

Kit B (276)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 7:04 am

Thanks Angelika, it is always interesting to learn what others not from the US think of any political happenings in the US.

Theodore Shayne (56)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 9:11 am
Noted, thanks.

Arlene C (28)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 5:22 pm
apprécié vos opinions

Bryna Pizzo (139)
Monday February 17, 2014, 10:13 pm
Bravo Pitt! He speaks truth to power. I agree with him on every point. It breaks my heart. I have told my family for years that I was a woman without a country because I don't recognize the country I live in. It is not the U.S. that I thought I lived in all my life. Thank goodness I am not alone. Vonnegut wrote a book with a title that mirrored my feelings. Pitt's observations support the statements I've made for years. It's a relief to know that I am not alone. I apologize for the late comment. Life has been complicated. Thank you, Kit. (n, p, t)
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.