Start A Petition

Community-Owned Internet, Long Targeted By ALEC and Big Telecom, Under Fire in Georgia

Science & Tech  (tags: dishonesty, cover-up, corruption, abuse, americans, government, ethics, propaganda, politics, usa, media, abuse, americans, business, consumers, corporate, corruption, lies, marketing, money, society, usa, technology, NewTechnology, internet )

- 2010 days ago -
Members of the American Legislative Exchange Council in the Georgia Legislature are pushing a bill to thwart locally-owned internet in underserved communities, an industry-sponsored effort that effectively reinforces the digital divide. (UPDATE: HB


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


JL A (281)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 10:53 am

PR Watch
Published on PR Watch (

Community-Owned Internet, Long Targeted by ALEC and Big Telecom, Under Fire in Georgia
by Brendan Fischer [1] March 7, 2013 - 9:17am

Members of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) in the Georgia Legislature are pushing a bill to thwart locally-owned internet in underserved communities, an industry-sponsored effort that effectively reinforces the digital divide. (UPDATE: HB 282 failed [8] on a 94-70 vote on March 7.) If Georgia had passed the bill it would have been the twentieth state to eliminate community control over internet access.
Rural and Poor Communities Take Control of Internet

As many as one in ten Americans cannot get internet connections that are fast enough for basic activities like streaming video or file sharing, largely because big internet providers like AT&T and Time Warner Cable have refused to provide adequate service to communities where the population is too dispersed or too poor. As local economies become ever more dependent on internet access, though, this digital divide is leaving rural and low-income communities in the dust.

But local governments in places like Wilson, North Carolina, and Thomasville, Georgia, have taken matters into their own hands: they've built [9] publicly owned high-speed internet to keep their communities viable in the 21st Century. These efforts have created jobs [10] and helped save local economies, with businesses that rely on digital communication remaining in, or relocating to, the newly wired communities.

Competition from these locally owned providers has irritated the big "incumbent" internet companies, which had managed to put-off upgrading their networks because of near-monopoly power in many areas. Municipal broadband -- which in many cases offers faster internet at a lower price -- "forces companies to invest in their own infrastructure because communities are doing it better," says Catharine Rice, President of the SouthEast Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (SEATOA).

Instead of responding to competition with improved services, the industry has responded by pushing a raft of bills to crush community and local broadband.

"It is cheaper to hire a lobbyist and push a bill than invest in infrastructure," Rice told the Center for Media and Democracy.

Georgia's HB 282 would prohibit cities from offering broadband to areas where just one home in a census block has internet speed above 3 Mbps. But 3Mbps is exceptionally slow. Businesses would likely be unable to upload a powerpoint presentation, doctors could not do medical file sharing or remote diagnosis, students could not access virtual education, and users could not access video on demand -- all of which is important for rural areas to remain competitive with the rest of the country, not to mention the world.

If Georgia passed the legislation it would be the twentieth state to preempt local efforts to offer broadband. The spread of these bills can be traced back to ALEC and its "model" Municipal Telecommunications Private Industry Safeguards Act [11]. Three of the five [12] named sponsors of Georgia's HB 282 are ALEC members.
ALEC Bill Passed in 19 States

Since at least 2001 ALEC has been a conduit for internet providers like AT&T and Time Warner Cable to eliminate competition. As Bloomberg Business Week has described [13], the bill that became the Municipal Telecommunications Private Industry Safeguards Act was largely drafted by AT&T and other big internet providers, and was first passed in Utah in 2001, after the city of Provo created a municipal broadband system. The following summer, the bill was brought to ALEC's Annual Meeting in Orlando and adopted as a "model" by the ALEC Telecommunications & Information Technology Task Force.

Since becoming a model bill, the Municipal Telecommunications Private Industry Safeguards Act [11] has spread across the country. Nineteen states now have restrictive municipal broadband bills on the books, according to [9] the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

It passed most recently in North Carolina, where the exceptionally successful [14] "Greenlight" program in Wilson had prompted incumbent internet providers like AT&T, CenturyLink, and Time Warner Cable to push the legislation starting in 2006. The bill had failed in previous sessions, but after control of the legislature shifted to Republicans in the 2010 elections and big telecom providers gave [15] nearly $1.6 million in campaign contributions to North Carolina legislators over a five-year period, it finally became law in 2011.

In addition to campaign contributions and payments to ALEC, big internet providers have influenced legislators with valuable gifts. For example, AT&T was the second-highest contributor [16] to the ALEC "scholarship" fund that pays for legislators' flights and hotel rooms to ALEC meetings -- a scheme [17] that creates an environment for improper influence and would appear to violate [18] many states' ethics and lobbying laws. ALEC meetings are often held in fun cities like New Orleans and at swank hotels, and because state legislators earn, on average, about $46,000 a year, these destinations and resorts would otherwise be unaffordable.

Nationally, AT&T gave $90,000 to the scholarship fund over a three-year period (2006-2008, the only years for which complete information is available). The legislators who are sponsoring the current bill before the Georgia legislature are major recipients of ALEC scholarships. Bill sponsor Representative Don Parsons, who is an active member [19] of the ALEC Telecommunications & Information Technology Task Force, received $5735.48 over those three years, and Representative Ben Harbin received $3546.08 over two years. HB 282 sponsor Representative Mark Hamilton received $3527.80 in "scholarships" in 2008 alone.

As a further incentive to attend ALEC meetings, elected officials are encouraged to bring their families and offered subsidized childcare and activities for kids six months and older, which they call "Kid's Congress." Time Warner Cable sponsored "Kid's Congress" at ALEC's 2011 Annual Meeting. At the April 2011 meeting, Time Warner Cable invited legislators to an exclusive party box at a Cincinnati Reds baseball game, with food and drink provided.

If a lobbyist wants to contact a legislator within a state and make their views known, they have their ear for perhaps 15 minutes. They also have to register and report the time and expenditures. But through ALEC, corporate interests can access legislators for three days of meetings, workshops, and parties, where elected officials are basically a captive audience -- and where they know who is footing the bill.
2012 Bill Defeated, Thanks to Business Opposition

Georgia first saw anti-municipal broadband legislation in 2012. That bill was introduced by then-Senator Chip Rogers (R), who was the ALEC State Chair for Georgia (until his retirement in December) and the winner of the 2011 "State Chair of the Year" award.

Sen. Rogers' bill was nearly a word-for-word duplication of what had passed in North Carolina. The bill had the support of the Georgia chapter of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, says Lou Comer, Director of Local Government Services at the Georgia Municipal Association, but Georgia businesses rallied against it.

Municipalities reached out to businesses in their communities, who then contacted their legislators to express opposition to the bill. "The businesses made it clear that 'we are getting good service'," Comer said. If municipal broadband were eliminated these companies would have no choice but to return to the high-cost, low-speed internet offered by the incumbent providers, she said.

The big internet providers framed their opposition to municipal broadband in free market terms: the public sector interfering with the private sector, and taxpayer money being "wasted" because municipal projects supposedly are unsuccessful -- the notion that private industry always does things better than government.

SEATOA's Rice doubts their motives. "Do these multi-billion dollar companies really care about community tax payers?" No, she says: "They care about their bottom line and profit margins."

If, as the industry alleges, municipal broadband projects are going to fail, the incumbent providers would have nothing to worry about. But according to Rice, "they are pushing these laws because they know [municipal broadband projects] don't fail."

Thomasville, Georgia, for example, built its broadband 14 years ago and has been so successful that local officials have actually eliminated property taxes. Contrary to the industry claim that these projects cost taxpayers money, residents in this community are actually paying less tax.

Municipalities are "all about the private sector because we need them for economic development," said the Georgia Municipal Association's Comer, noting that many of the rural communities that have built municipal broadband are solidly Republican.

"If the private sector would have come in and provided these services, [the municipalities] never would have needed to build their broadband projects," she said. "They had to do it to save their communities."
Georgia Bill Is Back

Georgia's legislation may have been defeated in 2012 but a version is back again in 2013.

"We are not second class citizens because we decided to live in rural Georgia," said Elberton, Georgia Mayor Larry Guest in testimony opposing the legislation.

"Georgia should be promoting a pro-business, inclusive approach to broadband deployment, especially in rural areas of the state," he said.

The bill is again being opposed by businesses in the state, as well as [20] tech companies like Google and Alcatel-Lucent, who argue that the private sector alone cannot build the nation's public infrastructure. Their letter [20] to Rep. Bill Parsons also notes the recent goal outlined by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to offer one gigabit access nationwide by 2015.

HB 282 has been modified from the 2012 version to exempt some existing broadband projects -- perhaps to neuter opposition from businesses already benefitting from municipal broadband -- but it still creates onerous burdens and thwarts new projects, perhaps even including those already underway.

"Other Georgia cities deserve the right to do what Elberton did, and their residents deserve the services Cumming has," Mayor Guest said, referring to two communities that have municipal broadband projects.

"Competition ensures market-based pricing and faster delivery of state-of-the-art services. We have to do everything we can to attract jobs. If we don't do that, business will not select rural Georgia. High speed access is essential to us."

UPDATE: HB 282 failed [8] on a 94-70 vote late in the evening on March 7, with a bipartisan coalition of rural Republicans and Democrats voting against it.

If you live in Georgia, you can send a letter to your representative [21] from the Color of Change website urging the defeat of HB 282.
Center for Media and Democracy 520 University Avenue, Suite 260 Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Phone: 608-260-9713 Fax: 608-260-9714
Source URL:


Beth M (138)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 11:38 am
There is no excuse for America to not have affordable internet for all of our citizens, other than greedy corporations who plot to run America.

JL A (281)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 12:21 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Beth because you have done so within the last day.

Kit B (276)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 1:42 pm

ALEC supporting big business over the common good? I'm shocked.... Meanwhile, back at the FCC who does have the power to make the Internet affordable and available to all communities in America, there is much talking and little action.

Makes ya wish for a Teddy Roosevelt to come back do some serious "busting" of these monopolies. What I am saying, these are separate companies in competition for your business buy offering the best possible service at the lowest price.

If you believe that, I have bridge for sale.


Past Member (0)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 2:17 pm
Sounds a bit backward if all the USA cannot have a reasonable fast internet

Noted thanks

JL A (281)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 2:59 pm
You are welcome and right Carol.
You cannot currently send a star to Kit because you have done so within the last day.
You cannot currently send a star to Carol because you have done so within the last day.

Theodore Shayne (56)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 4:53 pm
Another step in the advanced encroachment by the top percentile to bring us under the jack booted heel of the Mega Corps. The Outer Limits intro seems eerily applicable doesn't it?

John B (185)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 5:12 pm
Thanks J.L. for the interesting and informative post. I do hope the affected communities will organize in protest to make sure this bill is not re-introduced. Read and noted.

Mitchell D (87)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 6:07 pm
It is backward, as Carol said; it is regressive, and that is just what ALEC and its supporters want, to keep things centralized, and in the control of the Plutocrats.

JL A (281)
Saturday March 23, 2013, 6:15 pm
You are welcome John.
You cannot currently send a star to Theodore because you have done so within the last day.
You cannot currently send a star to John because you have done so within the last day.

Anna M (18)
Sunday March 24, 2013, 6:39 am
"thou shalt not make profit at the expense of thine corporate gods"

Helmut H (28)
Sunday March 24, 2013, 8:31 am
Noted and shared. Thanks JL!

JL A (281)
Sunday March 24, 2013, 9:45 am
You are welcome Helmut!

. (0)
Sunday March 24, 2013, 10:44 am
Talk about a bunch of control freaks.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Science & Tech

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.