Start A Petition

Astronomers Capture A Rare Wolf-Rayet Star Just Hours After It Dramatically Explodes


Science & Tech  (tags: astronomy, nasa, research, science, supernova, Wolf-Rayet star, astrophysics, discovery, space )

Michael
- 1608 days ago - iflscience.com
For the first time ever, scientists have gathered direct evidence that demonstrates a massive object with the characteristics of a Wolf-Rayet star met its demise in a ferocious Type IIb supernova explosion.



   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Michael O (176)
Friday May 23, 2014, 3:47 am
Furthermore, they were able to capture the event a mere 6 hours after the explosion was initiated. The observations have been published in Nature.

Our Sun may seem like a bit of a beast; after all, it makes up over 99% of the total mass of our Solar System and churns out a whopping 400 trillion watts of power per second. But compared with some stellar big boys, it’s a bit of a pansy. One example of a massive type of star is a Wolf-Rayet star; these stars have masses around 20 times greater than our Sun.

Little is known about these stars because they’re rare and often obscured from view by our telescopes, but astronomers are interested in them because they supply galaxies with vast amounts of heavy elements that will eventually give rise to planets. “We are gradually determining which kinds of stars explode, and why, and what kinds of elements they produce,” said Alex Filippenko, Professor of Astronomy at UC Berkeley and co-author of the paper. “These elements are crucial to the existence of life. In a very real sense, we are figuring out our own stellar origins.”

Researchers were able to capture a dramatic Wolf-Rayet supernova called SN 2013cu just a few hours after the explosion began thanks to the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory (iPTF) collaboration which makes use of resources based at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

“This is the smoking gun. For the first time, we can directly point to an observation and say that this type of Wolf-Rayet star leads to this kind of Type IIb supernova,” said co-author of the paper Peter Nugent, head of Berkeley Lab’s Computational Cosmology Center (C3).

Throughout their lives, stars produce energy by continually fusing atoms of hydrogen to produce helium. This process is faster in bigger stars to prevent them from collapsing under their own gravity. As supermassive stars age and begin to run out of hydrogen, they turn to fusing heavier elements such as carbon and magnesium which will ultimately cause the core to turn into iron. After the core reaches a certain size the star will collapse and release a huge amount of energy into space, triggering a shockwave that spews out the remains of the star as a supernova.

Prior to this superb explosion, some supermassive stars will enter a Wolf-Rayet phase where the heavy elements from the star’s core rise to the surface, triggering stellar winds that slough off material from the star into space. This is what muddies our vision of these stars, making studying them problematic.

“When a Wolf-Rayet star goes supernova, the explosion typically overtakes the stellar wind and all information about the progenitor star is gone,” said Nugent. “We got lucky with SN 2013cu- we caught the supernova before it overtook the wind. Shortly after the star exploded, it let out an ultraviolet flash from the shock wave that heated and lit up the wind. The conditions that we observed in this moment were very similar to what was there before the supernova.”

After initial observations revealed that the star was likely a Wolf-Rayet, telescopes around the world were alerted to follow the event. Because it was spotted fairly early on, researchers were able to take a series of observations of the supernova which detailed its spectra, or chemical signature, through the use of technique called “flash spectroscopy”. From this information, the team were able to deduce that SN 2013cu was a Type IIb supernova because of the weak hydrogen and strong helium signatures that appeared after it cooled.

According to Nugent, the exciting discovery raises the possibility that some of the world’s largest telescopes could pick up the spectrum of a Wolf-Rayet star in our neighboring galaxies, perhaps even those as near as 4 million light years away. SN 2013cu is located a whopping 360 million light years away.

Alongside shedding light on these elusive stars, this research could also provide insight into the origin of important elements such as carbon and oxygen.
 

David F (14)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 5:24 am
> 400 trillion watts of power per second
= certainly BS, probably BS**2

certainly, tne correct unit is W == J/s (power == energy/time)

and 400 trillionwatts ??? that'd be 400 TW (in more reasonable notation) - which (for sol's output) is Big BS, (for comparison:)
Earth.total solar irradiation= 46400 TW (~1/3 of which reaches surface)
gNPP= 2000 EJ/year = 63 TW avg. (~1/4 of which harvested by humans!)
geothermal: flow= 44.2 TW; radioactive.replenishment= 30 TW
humankind's average power consumption = ~ 16 TW (80-90% fossil)
global electricity production = ~2.5 TW ~2010
 

David F (14)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 5:32 am
sol's power output ... i can estimate without having to look up anything.
"solar constant" (at 1 AE) = roughly 1.3 kW/m**2, 1 AE = ~ 150 M km, a sphere's surface = (2*r)**2 * PI

sol's power output = about 1.3 kW/m**2 * ( 2*150 Gm ) **2 * 3.14 = 3.7 E26 W = 370 T T W = 370 trillions of trillion Watts

let's hope the writer was capable of copying the other stuff without too much BS !

 

Lindsay K (6)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 6:24 am
Amazing! Thanks for sharing
 

. (2)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 7:15 am


 

Roger G (148)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 11:23 am
noted, thanks
 

Volker B (48)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 12:06 pm
Noted, thanks.

There is also more information available at:
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2014/05/21/confirmed-stellar-behemoth-self-destructs-in-a-type-iib-supernova/
by Berkeley Lab.
This article also links to webpages describing the Keck telescope and the Swift satellite.
 

DaleLovesOttawa O (198)
Saturday May 24, 2014, 8:40 pm
Interesting, wish that I could see some of this in person...far enough away.
 

Nimue Michelle Pendragon Gaze (339)
Sunday May 25, 2014, 7:27 pm
Cool :)
 

Bob P (394)
Monday May 26, 2014, 10:42 am
Thanks Michael
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Science & Tech





 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.