Start A Petition

S.E. Cupp Can't Believe Mike Huckabee's 'Uncle Sugar' Comments Were Misunderstood (TEXT and VIDEO)

Society & Culture  (tags: media, TV, S.E. Cupp, women, Huckabee, society, ethics, government )

- 1938 days ago -
CNN Crossfire co-host S.E. Cupp was seemingly agog on Friday that people took offense to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee's (R) remarks regarding "Uncle Sugar" and womens' libidos.


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Sue Matheson (79)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 12:16 pm

Arielle S (313)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 12:22 pm
And I can't believe anybody would hear Huckabee speak without a heavy degree of skepticism. It is clear that the Republican brains have turned to mush - all the pages are stuck together.

Kit B (276)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 12:56 pm

Read the article. "S E Cupp is really interesting", said no one ever. Of course she knows that Huckabee was intentionally insulting women, but there is that urge to defend even the worst of the party of bland, boring and nastiness.

Birgit W (160)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 1:33 pm
Democratic treatment toward women by the Republicans? This is the biggest joke ever.

Elizabeth M (65)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 3:53 pm
Thanks for sharing Carrie.
In my opinion Huckabee was insulting women with the Uncle Sugar comments.

Joanne Dixon (37)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 4:06 pm
Misogynistic, patriarchal, need I say Republican treatment of women is all about demonizing us and our libidos - all of which is pure projection. Look, I'm not saying women don't have libidos, we do, but the "ungovernable libido" is a purely male phenomenon. Birth control for women has never been about libido. It is and has been about women being able to be available to men, and that has been about not getting beaten up and not getting kicked out or replaced. Which is about security (and protecting one's children), not libido. I don't even really care whether it is insulting or not. What it unquestionably is, is enslaving. Margaret Sanger's take on why she was working for birth control was insulting certainly. But at least her actions were liberating.

Lona Goudswaard (66)
Sunday January 26, 2014, 8:06 am
O, please Ms Cupp, how insulting to your viewers can you get of you want them to believe that this is not a Republican view, including your own. Please name me the Democrat or the document where Huckabee QUOTED from “they are helpless without Uncle Sugar coming in and providing them for them a prescription each month for birth control because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system without the help of government.”

Are we for one moment to believe that this is the way Democrats talk about women? Ms Cupp, you put all of women to shame by defending this guy. Go and sit in the corner with your dunce hat on, together with all the others.

Nancy M (147)
Sunday January 26, 2014, 9:59 am
First of all, I don't think there is necessarily a "war on Women" but I do agree totally that Republicans value the unborn first, then males and then woman.

Of course, many woman are able to afford to pay for birth control. ANd mopst men should also pay for birth control (and disease control- i.e. condom). Many women, rely on there insurance to pay for their prescriptions, just as men do. So of course, insurance should pay for the pill just as it pays for that little blue pill.

I might understand it better (though still disagree) if viagra was not allowed via health insuarnce. Why can't those on the right see that hypocrisy?

Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.